Literature DB >> 10155301

Quality-of-Life measurements for patients taking which drugs? The clinical PCASEE perspective.

P Bech1.   

Abstract

Of the many publications on quality of life in medicine over the last 2 decades, only a minor fraction have been devoted to drug trials. The most frequently investigated are classes of drugs within cancer disorders, hypertension and depressive illness. Health-related quality-of-life (QOL) measurements are typically applied in chronic or subchronic disorders where the balance between effectiveness (disease-modifying drug effects) and safety (adverse drug reactions) are assessed by patients in terms of subjective well-being. In this context, quality of life is an attempt to help the doctor to listen to his or her patient. The components of QOL measurements are to be found within the PCASEE model where: P = physical indicators; C = cognitive indicators; A = affective indicators; S = social indicators; E = economic-social stressors or negative life events; and E = ego function or personality problems. Most variance in QOL measurements arises through operating in the cognitive (e.g. lack of control, concentration difficulties) or affective (e.g. depressed mood or anxiety) components. The most specific component is, of course, adverse drug reactions, which are typically gastrointestinal symptoms in cancer therapies, and circulatory symptoms and sexual function with antihypertensive drugs. However, the affective and cognitive components also have different weights within subclasses of drugs, such as antihypertensive agents. Thus, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors act on the affective component (depression and anxiety) and calcium channel blockers on the cognitive component (neurasthenia). In general, patients with cancer or hypertension give more reliable assessments of their cognitive and affective symptoms than their doctors do, while patients with primary depression are less reliable than their doctors or relatives in measuring changes in the affective components of their illness when they are ill. Health-related QOL measurements have not only an impact on the doctor-patient relationship but also involve a holistic approach to drug treatment, by checking all the PCASEE components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10155301     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199507020-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  36 in total

1.  [Quality of life of patients with small cell lung cancer can be improved by treatment with cytostatic agents].

Authors:  B Bergman
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  1992-05-06

2.  The effect of supportive pamidronate treatment on aspects of quality of life of patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  A T van Holten-Verzantvoort; A H Zwinderman; N K Aaronson; J Hermans; B van Emmerik; F S van Dam; B van den Bos; O L Bijvoet; F J Cleton
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Quality of life, side effects and efficacy of lisinopril compared with metoprolol in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Authors:  J Frimodt-Moeller; D L Poulsen; H J Kornerup; P Bech
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Valuation of health states by the general public: feasibility of a standardized measurement procedure.

Authors:  M L Essink-Bot; G J Bonsel; P J van der Maas
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 6.  Quality of life in psychosomatic research. A psychometric model.

Authors:  P Bech
Journal:  Psychopathology       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.944

7.  The Social Readjustment Rating Scale.

Authors:  T H Holmes; R H Rahe
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  The Hamilton scales and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-90). A cross-national validity study in patients with panic disorders.

Authors:  P Bech; P Allerup; W Maier; M Albus; P Lavori; J L Ayuso
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.319

9.  The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life.

Authors:  S H Croog; S Levine; M A Testa; B Brown; C J Bulpitt; C D Jenkins; G L Klerman; G H Williams
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  The borderline syndromes of depression, mania and schizophrenia: the coaxial or temperamental approach.

Authors:  P Bech
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1994
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life in irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  R Lea; P J Whorwell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  A descriptive analysis of quality of life using patient-reported measures in major depressive disorder in a naturalistic outpatient setting.

Authors:  Waguih William Ishak; Konstantin Balayan; Catherine Bresee; Jared Matt Greenberg; Hala Fakhry; Scott Christensen; Mark Hyman Rapaport
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: a comparison of the SF-36 Mental Health subscale and the WHO-Five Well-Being Scale.

Authors:  Per Bech; Lis Raabaek Olsen; Mette Kjoller; Niels Kristian Rasmussen
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Assessing the burden of treatment-emergent adverse events associated with atypical antipsychotic medications.

Authors:  Pierre-Michel Llorca; Christophe Lançon; Ann Hartry; T Michelle Brown; Dana B DiBenedetti; Siddhesh A Kamat; Clément François
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.630

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.