R M Goodman1, F C Wheeler, P R Lee. 1. Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To present an evaluation of a 5-year, community-based, chronic disease prevention project managed by a state health department to determine whether the department could replicate similar previous projects that had received more funding and other resources. DESIGN: The evaluation used a matched comparison design and a review of archive and interview data. SETTING: Florence, South Carolina (population: 56,240). SUBJECTS: A random sample of 1642 persons in Florence (and 1551 in the comparison) who responded to a risk factor questionnaire and underwent a physical assessment; 70.7% of baseline subjects participated in the postintervention. Forty key persons were interviewed concerning project effectiveness. INTERVENTIONS BY PROJECT: Walk-a-thons, a speakers' bureau, media messages, restaurant food labeling, and cooking seminars. More than 31,000 participants were involved in 585 activities. MEASURES: Questionnaires focused on hypertension, obesity, high cholesterol, smoking, and exercise. Physical assessments determined lipid, lipoprotein, apolipoprotein, and blood pressure levels. Analysis of covariance was used for baseline and postintervention comparisons. Content analysis was used on archive and interview data. RESULTS: The project had a slightly favorable intervention effect on cholesterol and smoking, but failed to have an effect on other risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The project influenced community awareness, enlisted influential community members, and fostered linkages among local health services. CONCLUSIONS: Health departments can be instrumental in community risk reduction programming; however, they may not replicate projects having greater resources.
PURPOSE: To present an evaluation of a 5-year, community-based, chronic disease prevention project managed by a state health department to determine whether the department could replicate similar previous projects that had received more funding and other resources. DESIGN: The evaluation used a matched comparison design and a review of archive and interview data. SETTING: Florence, South Carolina (population: 56,240). SUBJECTS: A random sample of 1642 persons in Florence (and 1551 in the comparison) who responded to a risk factor questionnaire and underwent a physical assessment; 70.7% of baseline subjects participated in the postintervention. Forty key persons were interviewed concerning project effectiveness. INTERVENTIONS BY PROJECT: Walk-a-thons, a speakers' bureau, media messages, restaurant food labeling, and cooking seminars. More than 31,000 participants were involved in 585 activities. MEASURES: Questionnaires focused on hypertension, obesity, high cholesterol, smoking, and exercise. Physical assessments determined lipid, lipoprotein, apolipoprotein, and blood pressure levels. Analysis of covariance was used for baseline and postintervention comparisons. Content analysis was used on archive and interview data. RESULTS: The project had a slightly favorable intervention effect on cholesterol and smoking, but failed to have an effect on other risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The project influenced community awareness, enlisted influential community members, and fostered linkages among local health services. CONCLUSIONS: Health departments can be instrumental in community risk reduction programming; however, they may not replicate projects having greater resources.
Authors: R H Secker-Walker; B S Flynn; L J Solomon; J M Skelly; A L Dorwaldt; T Ashikaga Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Donna Shelley; Marianne Fahs; Rajeev Yerneni; Dhiman Das; Nam Nguyen; Dorothy Hung; Dee Burton; Margaret Chin; Ming-der Chang; K Michael Cummings Journal: Prev Med Date: 2008-07-18 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: R C Brownson; C A Smith; M Pratt; N E Mack; J Jackson-Thompson; C G Dean; S Dabney; J C Wilkerson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jeanine Albu; Nancy Sohler; Brenda Matti-Orozco; Jordan Sill; Daniel Baxter; Gary Burke; Edwin Young Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2013 Impact factor: 2.830