Literature DB >> 10147021

Health-related quality of life assessment and the pharmaceutical industry.

D A Revicki1, M Rothman, B Luce.   

Abstract

Concerns about cost containment in healthcare and interest in the impact of medical treatment on patient health status and well-being have increased the emphasis on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) research. HRQOL assessment as part of the development and evaluation of pharmaceuticals is a reality and is likely to increase over time. HRQOL studies may assist industry in the regulatory approval process, for marketing purposes, and to assist physicians and healthcare managers in making decisions about alternative drug therapies. HRQOL studies provide physicians with complete information about the benefits and risks of drug treatments in terms of patient physical, psychological, and social functioning and well-being. HRQOL measures, especially health utility assessments, can contribute to defining health outcomes in cost-effectiveness analyses. HRQOL studies need to be planned early in the drug development process and careful attention must be made to selecting comparative medical treatments, instrumentation, data collection protocols, length of follow-up, and sample size for these studies. It is important to address issues of investigator and other sources of bias. There is evidence that the pharmaceutical industry is increasing the use of HRQOL outcomes in clinical studies. Healthcare decision-makers, physicians and patients are demanding that industry demonstrate the impact of a new drug on patient HRQOL in addition to safety and efficacy. Clearly, HRQOL represents an important indicator of the benefit of pharmaceuticals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10147021     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199201060-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  34 in total

1.  Quality of life bibliography and indexes.

Authors:  B Spilker; F R Molinek; K A Johnston; R L Simpson; H H Tilson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Quality of life, health status, and clinical research.

Authors:  M Bergner
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Quality of life instruments in the evaluation of new drugs.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; G H Guyatt; D Cook
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Health status measures: an overview and guide for selection.

Authors:  M Bergner; M L Rothman
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of various initial monotherapies for mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  J T Edelson; M C Weinstein; A N Tosteson; L Williams; T H Lee; L Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Quality of life and its impact on hypertensive patients.

Authors:  G H Williams
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Auranofin therapy and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  C Bombardier; J Ware; I J Russell; M Larson; A Chalmers; J L Read
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life.

Authors:  S H Croog; S Levine; M A Testa; B Brown; C J Bulpitt; C D Jenkins; G L Klerman; G H Williams
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Effects of antihypertensive medications on vitality and well-being.

Authors:  S Levine; S H Croog; A Sudilovsky; M A Testa
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  Work performance, absenteeism and antihypertensive medications.

Authors:  S H Croog; A Sudilovsky; S Levine; M A Testa
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1987-02
View more
  7 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis: obstacles to standardisation and its use in regulating pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  B R Luce
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The economics of treating obesity.

Authors:  J Hutton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Translating safety, efficacy and compliance into economic value for controlled release dosage forms.

Authors:  M P Cramer; S R Saks
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  D A Revicki; R M Kaplan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Vision-specific instruments for the assessment of health-related quality of life and visual functioning: a literature review.

Authors:  Mary Kay Margolis; Karin Coyne; Tessa Kennedy-Martin; Timothy Baker; Oliver Schein; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Evaluating the quality of life associated with rifabutin prophylaxis for Mycobacterium avium complex in persons with AIDS: combining Q-TWiST and multiattribute utility techniques.

Authors:  D A Revicki; K N Simpson; A W Wu; R L LaVallee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Reliability and validity of a health-related quality of life battery for evaluating outpatient antidepressant treatment.

Authors:  D A Revicki; R Turner; R Brown; J J Martindale
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.147

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.