Literature DB >> 10146667

Randomized controlled trial of cost reductions from a health education program: the California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) study.

J F Fries1, H Harrington, R Edwards, L A Kent, N Richardson.   

Abstract

Purpose. This study evaluated the cost trend reduction from a health promotion program. Design. A randomized 12-month trial comparing claims data was conducted. Additional studies, utilizing quasi-experimental designs, analyzed changes in health habits and changes in costs estimated by self-report. Subjects. All active California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) employees (21,170), non-Medicare eligible retirees (8,316), and retirees with Medical Supplement coverage (25,416) administered by Blue Shield of California were included. Intervention. The program consisted of mailed health risk assessments at six- or 12-month intervals, with individualized reports and recommendation letters sent to participants emphasizing and encouraging change, self-management materials emphasizing self-care when appropriate, and quarterly newsletters. Passive participants received printed materials only. Measures. Health risks were based upon self-report; summary scores were computed by modified Framingham algorithms. Self-report cost data were estimated from reported doctor visits, hospital days, and days sick or confined to home. Claims data were those paid by Blue Shield of California. Results. The program was associated with: 1) reduction in health risk scores at 12 months, (p less than .001), 2) reduction of subject reported medical utilization from baseline (p less than .05), and 3) decrease in claims cost growth relative to controls (p=.03). Annual claims costs were approximately $3.2 to $8.0 million less than expected had costs for the experimental participants increased at the same rate as the control group. Discussion. Results suggest that appropriately designed health promotion programs can reduce health risks and at the same time reduce the medical care claims cost trend.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 10146667     DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-8.3.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  9 in total

1.  Substance abuse intervention for health care workers: a preliminary report.

Authors:  S C Lapham; I Chang; C Gregory
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Reducing need and demand for medical services in high-risk persons. A health education approach.

Authors:  J F Fries; D McShane
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-10

3.  Comparison of two health-promotion programs for older workers.

Authors:  Susan L Hughes; Rachel B Seymour; Richard T Campbell; James W Shaw; Camille Fabiyi; Rosemary Sokas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Effect of a Workplace Wellness Program on Employee Health and Economic Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Zirui Song; Katherine Baicker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Health care costs and participation in a community-based health promotion program for older adults.

Authors:  Charles Mayer; Barbara Williams; Edward H Wagner; James P LoGerfo; Allen Cheadle; Elizabeth A Phelan
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Compression of morbidity 1980-2011: a focused review of paradigms and progress.

Authors:  James F Fries; Bonnie Bruce; Eliza Chakravarty
Journal:  J Aging Res       Date:  2011-08-23

Review 7.  The Practice of Physical Activity on Psychological, Mental, Physical, and Social Wellbeing for Breast-Cancer Survivors: An Umbrella Review.

Authors:  Marta Zanghì; Luca Petrigna; Grazia Maugeri; Velia D'Agata; Giuseppe Musumeci
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 8.  Can health promotion programs save Medicare money?

Authors:  Ron Z Goetzel; David Shechter; Ronald J Ozminkowski; David C Stapleton; Pauline J Lapin; J Michael McGinnis; Catherine R Gordon; Lester Breslow
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Kennedy Space Center Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction Program evaluation.

Authors:  Kristine S Calderon; Charles Smallwood; David A Tipton
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.