Literature DB >> 10146477

A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions.

V T Francisco1, A L Paine, S B Fawcett.   

Abstract

Community coalitions are prominent mechanisms for building local capacities to address health and social concerns. Although there are case studies and descriptive reports on coalitions, there is little empirical information about coalition process and outcome. This paper describes a case study using a methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions. Data are fed back to coalition leaders and members, funding agents, and other relevant audiences as part of the development process. The monitoring system provides data on eight key measures of coalition process and outcome: the number of members, planning products, financial resources generated, dollars obtained, volunteers recruited, services provided, community actions and community changes. Illustrative data are presented for two different community health coalitions. Finally, challenges and opportunities in evaluating community coalitions are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10146477     DOI: 10.1093/her/8.3.403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  24 in total

1.  A model memorandum of collaboration: a proposal.

Authors:  S B Fawcett; V T Francisco; A Paine-Andrews; J A Schultz
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2000 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Commentaries from grantmakers on Fawcett et al.'s proposed memorandum of collaboration.

Authors:  M W Kreuter; B J Sabol; A O'Donovan; J Donovan; L Klein; L W Green; M Vliet; T Bradley; M K Campuzano; A R Tarlov
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2000 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial.

Authors:  Penelope Hawe; Alan Shiell; Therese Riley; Lisa Gold
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 4.  Toward a comprehensive strategy for effective practitioner-scientist partnerships and larger-scale community health and well-being.

Authors:  Richard L Spoth; Mark T Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2005-06

5.  Ecological theory in practice: illustrations from a community-based intervention to promote the health of recent mothers.

Authors:  Penelope Hawe; Therese Riley
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2005-09

6.  Evaluation findings from the Institute for Public Health and Faith Collaborations.

Authors:  Michelle Crozier Kegler; Mimi Kiser; Sarah M Hall
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  What motivates people to participate more in community-based coalitions?

Authors:  Rebecca Wells; Ann J Ward; Mark Feinberg; Jeffrey A Alexander
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2008-09

8.  EVALUATING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN RESEARCH: QUANTITATIVE MEASURE DEVELOPMENT.

Authors:  Melody S Goodman; Vetta L Sanders Thompson; Cassandra Arroyo Johnson; Renee Gennarelli; Bettina F Drake; Pravleen Bajwa; Maranda Witherspoon; Deborah Bowen
Journal:  J Community Psychol       Date:  2016-12-13

9.  Advancing coalition theory: the effect of coalition factors on community capacity mediated by member engagement.

Authors:  Michelle C Kegler; Deanne W Swan
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2011-09-12

10.  A typology of practice narratives during the implementation of a preventive, community intervention trial.

Authors:  Therese Riley; Penelope Hawe
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.