Literature DB >> 10140164

Technology acquisition in Canadian hospitals: how is it done, and where is the information coming from?

R Deber1, M Wiktorowicz, P Leatt, F Champagne.   

Abstract

A 1990 nation-wide survey on technology acquisition in Canadian hospitals, based on 509 Anglophone and 55 Francophone hospital questionnaires and 193 hospital equipment request forms, revealed that 53% of capital funds were used to replace existing equipment, with the remainder spent on new purchases. However, very little regional planning was taking place. Most of the institutional acquisition decisions were made by committees, 17% of which were classified as medical staff, 25.1% as administrative, 32.4% as board committees and 22.5% as mixed. Although administration was heavily represented, medical staff were frequently present and nursing was just as likely to have at least minimal representation. However, technical experts usually played a minimal role. This omission, combined with the limited information asked for on equipment request forms and the limited availability and use of technology assessment information, suggests that acquisition decisions in many Canadian hospitals are likely to be based on inadequate information.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 10140164     DOI: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)61074-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Manage Forum        ISSN: 0840-4704


  6 in total

Review 1.  A strategy to improve priority setting in health care institutions.

Authors:  Doug Martin; Peter Singer
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-03

2.  What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?

Authors:  David Reeleder; Douglas K Martin; Christian Keresztes; Peter A Singer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  SARS and hospital priority setting: a qualitative case study and evaluation.

Authors:  Jennifer A H Bell; Sylvia Hyland; Tania DePellegrin; Ross E G Upshur; Mark Bernstein; Douglas K Martin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-12-19       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Setting priorities in health care organizations: criteria, processes, and parameters of success.

Authors:  Jennifer L Gibson; Douglas K Martin; Peter A Singer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Factors explaining priority setting at community mental health centres: a quantitative analysis of referral assessments.

Authors:  Sverre Grepperud; Per Arne Holman; Knut Reidar Wangen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Decision-Making on New Non-Drug Health Technologies by Hospitals and Health Authorities in Canada.

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Raisa Deber; Marc Rhainds; Janet Martin; Tom Noseworthy; Stirling Bryan; Devidas Menon
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2019-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.