Literature DB >> 10130845

Cost-effectiveness of a tobacco 'quit and win' contest in Sweden.

P Tillgren1, M Rosén, B J Haglund, T Ainetdin, L Lindholm, L E Holm.   

Abstract

Tobacco is one of the major causes of premature deaths in the world, and any effort to improve the cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation is worth while. The costs and effects in years of life saved (YLS) were estimated for a tobacco 'Quit and Win' (Q&W) contest in Sweden. The contest was conducted during the autumn of 1988 and included two strategies: a national mass media strategy and an organizational strategy for Stockholm County. A total of 12,840 people participated in the Q&W contest. The model for analysis included programme effects and programme costs, and the data was presented in (YLS). Both effects and costs were discounted. Data about non-smoking participants after 12 months and the number of spontaneous quitters was based on random samples of participants and of the general population, respectively. The programme costs included intervention as well as evaluation costs, e.g. costs of personnel, campaign materials, distribution, prizes for the contest, rent and administration and overhead costs for the project group and the collaborating organizations. The cost per YLS varied between US$188 and US$1222. The Q&W contest, as a method of helping tobacco users quit, compares favourably with most preventive and treatment programmes, and the method seems to be quite an effective way for society to use scarce resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10130845     DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(93)90077-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  6 in total

1.  Quit and Win campaigns as a long-term anti-smoking intervention in North Karelia and other parts of Finland.

Authors:  T Korhonen; E L Urjanheimo; P Mannonen; H J Korhonen; A Uutela; P Puska
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Cost effectiveness of smoking-cessation therapies. Interpretation of the evidence-and implications for coverage.

Authors:  K E Warner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Health and social costs of tobacco use in Ontario, Canada, 1979 and 1988.

Authors:  B C Choi; A W Pak
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Cost effectiveness of a community based research project to help women quit smoking.

Authors:  R H Secker-Walker; R R Holland; C M Lloyd; D Pelkey; B S Flynn
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  International Quit and Win 1996: comparative evaluation study in China and Finland.

Authors:  S Sun; T Korhonen; A Uutela; H J Korhonen; P Puska; Y Jun; Y Chonghua; G Zeyu; W Yonghao; X Wenqing
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Competitions for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Thomas R Fanshawe; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Rafael Perera; Nicola Lindson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.