Literature DB >> 15735298

Cost effectiveness of a community based research project to help women quit smoking.

R H Secker-Walker1, R R Holland, C M Lloyd, D Pelkey, B S Flynn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost effectiveness of a four year, multifaceted, community based research project shown previously to help women quit smoking.
DESIGN: A quasi-experimental matched control design.
SETTING: Two counties in Vermont and two in New Hampshire, USA.
SUBJECTS: Women aged 18-64 years.
METHODS: Costs were the grant related expenditures converted to 2002 US dollars. Survey results at the end of the intervention were used to estimate the numbers of never smokers, former smokers, light smokers, and heavy smokers in the intervention and comparison counties, and 1986 life tables for populations of US women categorised by smoking status to estimate the gain in life expectancy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost effectiveness ratios, as dollars per life-year saved, for the intervention only and for total grant costs (intervention, evaluation and indirect costs).
RESULTS: The cost effectiveness ratio for the intervention, in 2002 US dollars per life-year saved, discounted at 3%, was 1156 dollars (90% confidence interval (CI) 567 dollars to infinity), and for the total grant, 4022 dollars (90% CI 1973 dollars to infinity). When discounted at 5%, these ratios were 1922 dollars (90% CI 1024 dollars to 15,647 dollars), and 6683 dollars (90% CI 3555 dollars to 54,422 dollars), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The cost effectiveness ratios of this research project are economically attractive, and are comparable with other smoking cessation interventions for women. These observations should encourage further research and dissemination of community based interventions to reduce smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15735298      PMCID: PMC1747988          DOI: 10.1136/tc.2003.005470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  32 in total

1.  The impact of a community-based heart disease prevention program in a low-income, inner-city neighborhood.

Authors:  J L O'Loughlin; G Paradis; K Gray-Donald; L Renaud
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Effect of a community action program on adult quit smoking rates in rural australian towns: the CART project.

Authors:  L Hancock; R Sanson-Fisher; J Perkins; A McClintock; P Howley; R Gibberd
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Cost-effectiveness of the North Karelia Hypertension Program. 1972-1977.

Authors:  A Nissinen; J Tuomilehto; T E Kottke; P Puska
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Community based heart health promotion project in England. Authors conclusions are unjustified and misleading.

Authors:  G D Smith; S Ebrahim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-28

5.  Cost-effectiveness of a community anti-smoking campaign targeted at a high risk group in London.

Authors:  Warren Stevens; Margaret Thorogood; Seher Kayikki
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.483

6.  The community-based strategy to prevent coronary heart disease: conclusions from the ten years of the North Karelia project.

Authors:  P Puska; A Nissinen; J Tuomilehto; J T Salonen; K Koskela; A McAlister; T E Kottke; N Maccoby; J W Farquhar
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 21.981

7.  Cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent or treat coronary heart disease.

Authors:  M C Weinstein; W B Stason
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  A decline in earning losses associated with a community-based cardiovascular disease prevention project.

Authors:  T E Kottke; P Puska; R Feldman; J T Salonen; J Tuomilehto
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Helping women quit smoking: results of a community intervention program.

Authors:  R H Secker-Walker; B S Flynn; L J Solomon; J M Skelly; A L Dorwaldt; T Ashikaga
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 10.  Community interventions for reducing smoking among adults.

Authors:  R H Secker-Walker; W Gnich; S Platt; T Lancaster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002
View more
  8 in total

1.  Encouraging smokers to quit: the cost effectiveness of reimbursing the costs of smoking cessation treatment.

Authors:  Janneke Kaper; Edwin J Wagena; Constant P van Schayck; Johan L Severens
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  The Economic Impact of Smoking and of Reducing Smoking Prevalence: Review of Evidence.

Authors:  Victor U Ekpu; Abraham K Brown
Journal:  Tob Use Insights       Date:  2015-07-14

3.  Mobile contingency management for smoking cessation among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults: Protocol for a randomized trial.

Authors:  Darla E Kendzor; Michael S Businelle; Damon J Vidrine; Summer G Frank-Pearce; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Jesse Dallery; Adam C Alexander; Laili Kharazi Boozary; Joseph J C Waring; Sarah J Ehlke
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.261

4.  Mathematical modelling in tobacco control research: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Shari Feirman; Elisabeth Donaldson; Jennifer Pearson; Grace Zawistowski; Ray Niaura; Allison Glasser; Andrea C Villanti
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Narratives of community engagement: a systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions.

Authors:  Ginny Brunton; James Thomas; Alison O'Mara-Eves; Farah Jamal; Sandy Oliver; Josephine Kavanagh
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Incremental Benefits of Multiple Tobacco Control Interventions: A Factorial Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Divya Persai; Anup Karan; Rajmohan Panda
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 7.  A review of economic evaluations of tobacco control programs.

Authors:  Jennifer W Kahende; Brett R Loomis; Bishwa Adhikari; Latisha Marshall
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2008-12-28       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  'People pull the rug from under your feet': barriers to successful public health programmes.

Authors:  Deborah Ritchie; Wendy Gnich; Odette Parry; Steve Platt
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.