Literature DB >> 10126528

The irreversibility of death: reply to Cole.

T Tomlinson1.   

Abstract

Professor Cole is correct in his conclusion that the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) protocol does not violate requirements of "irreversibility" in criteria of death, but wrong about the reasons. "Irreversible" in this context is best understood not as an ontological or epistemic term, but as an ethical one. Understood that way, the patient declared dead under the protocol is "irreversibly" so, even though resuscitation by medical means is still possible. Nonetheless, the protocol revives difficult questions about our concept of death.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Health Care and Public Health; Uniform Anatomical Gift Act; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10126528     DOI: 10.1353/ken.0.0053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J        ISSN: 1054-6863


  5 in total

1.  Defining death in non-heart beating organ donors.

Authors:  N Zamperetti; R Bellomo; C Ronco
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Organ transplant initiatives: the twilight zone.

Authors:  D P Price
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  How (not) to think of the 'dead-donor' rule.

Authors:  Adam Omelianchuk
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2018-02

4.  When are you dead enough to be a donor? Can any feasible protocol for the determination of death on circulatory criteria respect the dead donor rule?

Authors:  Govert den Hartogh
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2019-08

Review 5.  Recovery of transplantable organs after cardiac or circulatory death: transforming the paradigm for the ethics of organ donation.

Authors:  Joseph L Verheijde; Mohamed Y Rady; Joan McGregor
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 2.464

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.