| Literature DB >> 10126528 |
Abstract
Professor Cole is correct in his conclusion that the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) protocol does not violate requirements of "irreversibility" in criteria of death, but wrong about the reasons. "Irreversible" in this context is best understood not as an ontological or epistemic term, but as an ethical one. Understood that way, the patient declared dead under the protocol is "irreversibly" so, even though resuscitation by medical means is still possible. Nonetheless, the protocol revives difficult questions about our concept of death.Entities:
Keywords: Death and Euthanasia; Health Care and Public Health; Uniform Anatomical Gift Act; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Mesh:
Year: 1993 PMID: 10126528 DOI: 10.1353/ken.0.0053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kennedy Inst Ethics J ISSN: 1054-6863