Literature DB >> 10124523

Point and counterpoint. Should academic ethics committees be available to review lapses in scientific integrity?

P A Miya, W J Pinch, W Holleman, C Chappell.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10124523     DOI: 10.1007/BF01454918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HEC Forum        ISSN: 0956-2737


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Ethics in research.

Authors:  Ruth Macklin
Journal:  CBE Views       Date:  1981

2.  Scientific misconduct as a dilemma for nursing.

Authors:  D J Hawley; J M Jeffers
Journal:  Image J Nurs Sch       Date:  1992

3.  Biomedical information, peer review, and conflict of interest as they influence public health.

Authors:  E I Cantekin; T W McGuire; R L Potter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Scientific misconduct: myth or reality?

Authors:  F G Abdellah
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  The integrity of the scientific literature.

Authors:  W W Stewart; N Feder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jan 15-21       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Human experimentation--the ethical questions persist.

Authors:  R M Veatch; S Sollitto
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Ethics and clinical research.

Authors:  H K Beecher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1966-06-16       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Underreporting research is scientific misconduct.

Authors:  I Chalmers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.