Literature DB >> 10107493

Identifying clinical appropriateness in the catastrophic psychiatric case.

L S Goldstein1, P E Browne.   

Abstract

Catastrophic psychiatric illness has been commonly identified by demographic factors such as cost (greater than $10,000) and length of treatment (greater than 30 days). In order to determine which cases could have been better managed in order to prevent the high cost and long length of treatment, clinical identifiers were formulated by the authors. The authors examined reviews of cases identified by third-party payors and reviewed by psychiatrist reviewers. They found that the majority of the catastrophic cases were not truly clinically catastrophic but were catastrophic in terms of resource utilization. This was due to patient non-compliance, poor treatment management and poor benefit management. The authors conclude that catastrophic costs and extended treatment could be prevented, in some cases, through the use of better practice patterns and case management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 10107493     DOI: 10.1007/bf02521144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ment Health Adm        ISSN: 0092-8623


  3 in total

1.  A successful approach to the start up of a mental health case management program.

Authors:  S Lizanich-Aro; L Goldstein
Journal:  Qual Assur Util Rev       Date:  1988-08

2.  Identifying catastrophic psychiatric cases. Targeting managed-care strategies.

Authors:  J M Goldstein; E L Bassuk; S K Holland; D Zimmer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The psychiatric, alcohol, and drug algorithm: a decision model for the nurse reviewer.

Authors:  J Grossman
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1987-09
  3 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  The impact of private utilization management on psychiatric care: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D Hodgkin
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1992
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.