Literature DB >> 10121507

The impact of private utilization management on psychiatric care: a review of the literature.

D Hodgkin1.   

Abstract

Psychiatric care in the United States is increasingly practiced subject to some form of utilization management (UM) by third parties. This paper reviews recent studies of UM in the privately insured mental health sector, and finds some limited evidence that UM reduces utilization and costs to the payer. Less is known about UM's effect on mental health outcomes, or its financial impacts on patients, providers, and society. Implications concerning the regulation of UM are discussed, and suggestions are made for future research on the impact of UM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10121507     DOI: 10.1007/BF02521315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ment Health Adm        ISSN: 0092-8623


  36 in total

1.  Myths and mystifications of managed care.

Authors:  J P Docherty
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1990

2.  From insured to managed mental health care.

Authors:  L Wenzel
Journal:  Healthspan       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec

3.  Psychiatric case management offers cost, quality control.

Authors:  A R Rodriguez; J J Maher
Journal:  Bus Health       Date:  1986-03

4.  How to make a soft landing.

Authors:  P R Peterson
Journal:  Bus Health       Date:  1988-07

5.  A case study of state managed care regulation: utilization review laws.

Authors:  M A Snyder
Journal:  Benefits Q       Date:  1992

6.  A new look at rising mental health insurance costs.

Authors:  R G Frank; D S Salkever; S S Sharfstein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 7.  Utilization review: theory, practice, and issues.

Authors:  J Zusman
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1990-05

8.  Should we regulate 'utilization management?'.

Authors:  M J Field; B H Gray
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Does utilization review reduce unnecessary hospital care and contain costs?

Authors:  T M Wickizer; J R Wheeler; P J Feldstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  The negative impacts of increased concurrent review of psychiatric inpatient care.

Authors:  S D Melnick; L L Lyter
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1987-03
View more
  7 in total

1.  Clinicians as advocates: an exploratory study of responses to managed care by mental health professionals.

Authors:  Nancy Wolff; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Development of clinical methods for utilization review in psychiatric day treatment.

Authors:  K G Terkelsen; R H McCarthy; R L Munich; B E Hurley
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1994

3.  A comprehensive system for value accounting in psychiatry.

Authors:  S F Butler; J P Docherty
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1996

4.  Managed mental health care and patterns of inpatient utilization for treatment of affective disorders.

Authors:  R G Frank; R Brookmeyer
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  The determinants of dumping: a national study of economically motivated transfers involving mental health care.

Authors:  M Schlesinger; R Dorwart; C Hoover; S Epstein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Does type of gatekeeping model affect access to outpatient specialty mental health services?

Authors:  Dominic Hodgkin; Elizabeth L Merrick; Constance M Horgan; Deborah W Garnick; Thomas J McLaughlin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Changing mental health gatekeeping: effects on performance indicators.

Authors:  Elizabeth Levy Merrick; Dominic Hodgkin; Constance M Horgan; Deborah W Garnick; Thomas J McLaughlin
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 1.505

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.