Literature DB >> 10102763

Enhanced conditioned inhibition following repeated pretreatment with d-amphetamine.

C J Harmer1, G D Phillips.   

Abstract

We have shown that prior repeated exposure to d-amphetamine facilitates appetitive Pavlovian conditioning. However, animals sensitised in this manner also show elevated levels of stimulated activity. To investigate whether enhanced conditioning was dependent upon increased activity, a conditioned inhibition task was employed in the present study. Rats received d-amphetamine (2 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle once per day for 7 days. After a 7-day drug-free period, an activity assay confirmed that repeated d-amphetamine treatment markedly elevated the locomotor response to a subsequent challenge with 0.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine. Conditioning began 6 days later. In phase 1, stimulus A+ (light or tone) immediately preceded sucrose availability (excitatory conditioning). In phase 2, sucrose again was presented after A+ alone, but not after presentation of a compound of A+ with a second stimulus (AB-). Sensitisation enhanced the acquisition of conditioned approach behaviour to the excitatory stimulus A+ in phase 1. Furthermore, acquisition of conditioned inhibition to the stimulus compound, AB-, was also facilitated. Thus, sensitised rats showed reduced levels of responding to the stimulus compound far sooner than controls. Finally, a retardation test was carried out in stage 3, in which the inhibitory stimulus B- was paired alone with sucrose reward. Sensitised rats initially showed retarded acquisition of excitatory conditioned responding relative to controls, suggesting that B possessed stronger inhibitory associations in these animals. However, sensitised animals again exhibited higher levels of responding in later sessions, consistent with the enhanced excitatory conditioning shown in phase 1. These findings suggest that prior repeated d-amphetamine enhanced the acquisition of inhibitory and excitatory Pavlovian associations; a propensity not readily attributable to stimulated locomotor hyperactivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10102763     DOI: 10.1007/s002130050870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  17 in total

1.  Cellular mechanisms of infralimbic and prelimbic prefrontal cortical inhibition and dopaminergic modulation of basolateral amygdala neurons in vivo.

Authors:  J Amiel Rosenkranz; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Dopamine attenuates prefrontal cortical suppression of sensory inputs to the basolateral amygdala of rats.

Authors:  J A Rosenkranz; A A Grace
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Conditioned drug reward enhances subsequent spatial learning and memory in rats.

Authors:  Hai-feng Zhai; Zhang-Yin Zhang; Mei Zhao; Yi Qiu; Udi E Ghitza; Lin Lu
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Phasic dopamine release in appetitive behaviors and drug addiction.

Authors:  Matthew J Wanat; Ingo Willuhn; Jeremy J Clark; Paul E M Phillips
Journal:  Curr Drug Abuse Rev       Date:  2009-05

Review 5.  Aberrant learning and memory in addiction.

Authors:  Mary M Torregrossa; Philip R Corlett; Jane R Taylor
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  Influence of morphine sensitization on the responsiveness of mesolimbic and mesocortical dopamine transmission to appetitive and aversive gustatory stimuli.

Authors:  Maria Antonietta De Luca; Zisis Bimpisidis; Valentina Bassareo; Gaetano Di Chiara
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Repeated nicotine exposure during adolescence alters reward-related learning in male and female rats.

Authors:  Stacey L Quick; Peter Olausson; Nii A Addy; Jane R Taylor
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Amphetamine-induced sensitization and reward uncertainty similarly enhance incentive salience for conditioned cues.

Authors:  Mike J F Robinson; Patrick Anselme; Kristen Suchomel; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Incentive sensitization by previous amphetamine exposure: increased cue-triggered "wanting" for sucrose reward.

Authors:  C L Wyvell; K C Berridge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The effects of amphetamine sensitization on conditioned inhibition during a Pavlovian-instrumental transfer task in rats.

Authors:  Michael W Shiflett; Meaghan Riccie; RoseMarie DiMatteo
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.