Literature DB >> 10101323

The clinical significance of proximal tibial resection level in total knee arthroplasty.

M A Ritter1, T J Montgomery, H Zhou, M E Keating, P M Faris, J B Meding.   

Abstract

Clinical and radiographic data were collected in 139 patients with 195 posterior cruciate retaining total condylar knee prostheses to evaluate the relationship of the proximal tibial resection level with long term results. Among the 139 patients were 75 patients with 106 total knee replacements observed for more than 8 years. All patients underwent biyearly routine examinations, including radiographs and clinical evaluations. The average medial tibial resection for the 139 patients with 195 total knee replacements was 2.95 mm, and in the subset of 75 patients (106 knees) observed for more than 8 years, it was 3.3 mm; both groups had a maximum of 14 mm. Sixty-three percent or 67 knees had medial resection levels of 3 mm or less. The average lateral tibial resection for the 195 knees was 5.48 mm and in the 106 knees was 5.71 mm, with a maximum of 22 mm. Fifty-one percent of 104 knees had lateral resection levels of 5 mm or less. Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant correlation between the level of proximal tibial resection and Knee Society knee score, range of motion, radiolucencies, or loosening or revision. These long term results suggest that minimal proximal tibial resection is not necessary for a successful arthroplasty, and problems associated with minimal resection, such as joint line elevation and thin polyethylene inserts, can be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10101323     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199903000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer-assisted implantation versus the conventional technique.

Authors:  Lars Perlick; Holger Bäthis; Carsten Perlick; Christian Lüring; Markus Tingart; Joachim Grifka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Joint line changes after primary total knee arthroplasty: navigated versus non-navigated.

Authors:  A Jawhar; V Shah; S Sohoni; H P Scharf
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Change in collateral ligament length and tibiofemoral movement following joint line variation in TKA.

Authors:  Kun-Jhih Lin; Hung-Wen Wei; Chang-Hung Huang; Yu-Liang Liu; Wen-Chuan Chen; Colin Joseph McClean; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [Revision prosthetic of the knee joint. The influence of a navigation system on the alignment and reconstruction of the joint line].

Authors:  L Perlick; C Lüring; M Tingart; J Grifka; H Bäthis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Radiological study of the knee joint line position measured from the fibular head and proximal tibial landmarks.

Authors:  Eric Havet; Antoine Gabrion; Frederic Leiber-Wackenheim; Joël Vernois; Bruno Olory; Patrice Mertl
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 1.354

6.  Does joint line elevation after revision knee arthroplasty affect tibio-femoral kinematics, contact pressure or collateral ligament lengths? An in vitro analysis.

Authors:  Jacek B Kowalczewski; Luc Labey; Yan Chevalier; Tomasz Okon; Bernardo Innocenti; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  A new method for evaluation of patellar height and the position of the joint line before and after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hua Han; Xiaohui Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.