Literature DB >> 10098997

Legal abortion in Asturias (Spain) after the 1985 law: sociodemographic characteristics of women applying for abortion.

M Uria1, C Mosquera.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of induced abortion (IA) in Asturias after its legalisation as well as the socio-demographic characteristics of women applying for abortion. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Descriptive study, population-based, using data collected by the regional abortion surveillance system for the period 1988 1994. MAIN
RESULTS: The number of IA and the abortion rate (AR) (10 per 1000 women aged 15-49) have been stable in Asturias during the study period. The highest ARs were found for women in the age group 20-34, for divorced/separated, for women with a higher educational level and for women with only one child. The proportion of pregnancies which ended in abortion was one in four; for teenagers and women over 34 years it was one in two. This proportion was also higher for women not married, students and women with two or more children. Ninety-eight percent of all abortions took place in private clinics, the woman's physical/mental health being the medical indication for these abortions. Abortion was most often performed within eight weeks of gestation (65%). Late abortion ocurred more frequently among teenagers and women of low educational level. Eighteen percent of women had repeated abortions. A high proportion (61%) of women applying for abortion had not used the Family Planning (FP) services in the previous two years; adolescents and women of low educational level had the lowest frequencies of FP use.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with that of other European countries, the AR in Asturias was intermediate. The results regarding adolescents show the need for evaluation and promotion of sex education and contraceptive programmes. The lower and later use of abortion by women of low educational level shows inequalities that call for specific action.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10098997     DOI: 10.1023/a:1007541904470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  14 in total

1.  Abortion surveillance: preliminary data--United States, 1990.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1992-12-18       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Emergency contraception.

Authors:  J Cayley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-23

3.  Pregnant teenagers' knowledge and use of emergency contraception.

Authors:  V A Pearson; M R Owen; D R Phillips; D J Gray; M N Marshall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-24

4.  [Proposed method to estimate underreporting of induced abortion in Spain].

Authors:  C Rodríguez Blas; J M Sendra Gutiérrez; E Regidor Poyatos; J L Gutiérrez Fisac; J Iñigo Martínez
Journal:  Gac Sanit       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.139

5.  The UPA score and teenage pregnancy.

Authors:  R Garlick; B Ineichen; F Hudson
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.427

6.  Influence of socioeconomic factors on attaining targets for reducing teenage pregnancies.

Authors:  T Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-08

7.  Changes in fertility and the acceptability of pregnancies in northern Finland during the last 20 years.

Authors:  P Rantakallio; A Myhrman
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Socio-demographic characteristics of women requesting induced abortion. A cross-sectional study from the municipality of Malmö, Sweden.

Authors:  H Söderberg; C Andersson; L Janzon; N O Sjöberg
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Abortion surveillance, United States, 1988.

Authors:  L M Koonin; K D Kochanek; J C Smith; M Ramick
Journal:  MMWR CDC Surveill Summ       Date:  1991-07

10.  Epidemiology of legal abortion in Italy.

Authors:  I Figà-Talamanca; M E Grandolfo; A Spinelli
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  4 in total

1.  Trends in inequalities in induced abortion according to educational level among urban women.

Authors:  Gloria Pérez; Irene García-Subirats; Maica Rodríguez-Sanz; Elia Díez; Carme Borrell
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Socioeconomic inequalities in unintended pregnancy and abortion decision.

Authors:  Laia Font-Ribera; Glòria Pérez; Joaquín Salvador; Carme Borrell
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Obstetric and psychological characteristics of women seeking multiple abortions in the region of Monastir (Tunisia): results of a cross-sectional design.

Authors:  Sana El Mhamdi; Arwa Ben Salah; Ines Bouanene; Imen Hlaiem; Saloua Hadhri; Wahiba Maatouk; Mohamed Soltani
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  How risky are second trimester clandestine abortions in Cameroon: a retrospective descriptive study.

Authors:  Elie Nkwabong; Robinson Enow Mbu; Joseph Nelson Fomulu
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 2.809

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.