Literature DB >> 10094948

Low-dose midazolam sedation: an option for patients undergoing serial hepatic venous pressure measurements.

A F Steinlauf1, G Garcia-Tsao, M F Zakko, K Dickey, T Gupta, R J Groszmann.   

Abstract

The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is becoming increasingly used clinically. It is useful in the differential diagnosis of portal hypertension and provides a prognostic index in cirrhotic patients. Performance of serial measurements has been shown to be useful in guiding pharmacological therapy of portal hypertension and variceal hemorrhage. The technique is safe to perform; however, many patients are anxious and reluctant to undergo serial measurements. The effects of sedatives on portal pressure measurements have not yet been defined. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of midazolam on the HVPG. Twenty patients with compensated cirrhosis were included in this prospective, double-blind study. The HVPG was determined by subtracting the free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) from the wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP). Patients were randomized to receive either placebo, 0.02 mg/kg midazolam, or 0.03 mg/kg midazolam, administered intravenously over 3 minutes. Immediately after drug administration and every 3 minutes thereafter, for a total of 30 or 40 minutes, measurements were repeated. Three hours later, patients were asked to state whether the sedative affected their state of comfort/relaxation. The effects of both doses of midazolam on HVPG did not differ significantly from those of placebo. Furthermore, neither dose of midazolam induced significant changes in HVPG as compared with baseline values. However, higher-dose midazolam (0.03 mg/kg) was associated with significant reductions in FHVP from baseline and a tendency for a reduction in WHVP. Both doses significantly increased patient comfort and relaxation during the test. Midazolam, used at a dose of 0.02 mg/kg, is effective in increasing patient comfort and relaxation during hepatic venous pressure measurements, without significantly affecting pressures (HVPG, WHVP, or FHVP). It is therefore an acceptable option for patients undergoing serial hepatic venous pressure measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10094948     DOI: 10.1002/hep.510290421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  8 in total

Review 1.  Duplex Doppler ultrasound examination of the portal venous system: an emerging novel technique for the estimation of portal vein pressure.

Authors:  Ashwani K Singal; Masood Ahmad; Roger D Soloway
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Sildenafil has no effect on portal pressure but lowers arterial pressure in patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Authors:  Puneeta Tandon; Irteza Inayat; Michael Tal; Marcelo Spector; Martha Shea; Roberto J Groszmann; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Indocyanine Green Retention Rates at 15 min Predicted Hepatic Decompensation in a Western Population.

Authors:  Bertrand Le Roy; Emilie Grégoire; Cyril Cossé; Badr Serji; Nicolas Golse; René Adam; Daniel Cherqui; Jean-Yves Mabrut; Yves-Patrice Le Treut; Eric Vibert
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  The clinical use of HVPG measurements in chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Jaime Bosch; Juan G Abraldes; Annalisa Berzigotti; Juan Carlos García-Pagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Transjugular Portosystemic Stent Shunt: Impact of Right Atrial Pressure on Portal Venous Hemodynamics Within the First Week.

Authors:  Michael Bernhard Pitton; Arndt Weinmann; Roman Kloeckner; Jens Mittler; Christian Ruckes; Christoph Düber; Gerd Otto
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Impact of propofol sedation on the diagnostic accuracy of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Fahim Ebrahimi; David Semela; Markus Heim
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 9.029

7.  Diagnosing Portal Hypertension with Noninvasive Subharmonic Pressure Estimates from a US Contrast Agent.

Authors:  Ipshita Gupta; John R Eisenbrey; Priscilla Machado; Maria Stanczak; Corinne E Wessner; Colette M Shaw; Sriharsha Gummadi; Jonathan M Fenkel; Alison Tan; Cynthia Miller; Julia Parent; Susan Schultz; Michael C Soulen; Chandra M Sehgal; Kirk Wallace; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Austrian consensus guidelines on the management and treatment of portal hypertension (Billroth III).

Authors:  Thomas Reiberger; Andreas Püspök; Maria Schoder; Franziska Baumann-Durchschein; Theresa Bucsics; Christian Datz; Werner Dolak; Arnulf Ferlitsch; Armin Finkenstedt; Ivo Graziadei; Stephanie Hametner; Franz Karnel; Elisabeth Krones; Andreas Maieron; Mattias Mandorfer; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Florian Rainer; Philipp Schwabl; Vanessa Stadlbauer; Rudolf Stauber; Herbert Tilg; Michael Trauner; Heinz Zoller; Rainer Schöfl; Peter Fickert
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 1.704

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.