Literature DB >> 10094873

A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen.

L W Huang1, J L Hwang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is as effective as cold knife conization (CKC) in the removal of cervical dysplasia.
METHODS: One-hundred sixteen patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia were included: 73 cases treated with LEEP and 43 cases treated with CKC. All of these patients underwent subsequent hysterectomy within 6 months of treatment. A thorough histological evaluation of the cone specimens and post-cone hysterectomy specimens was performed.
RESULTS: No residual disease in the post-cone hysterectomy specimens was identified in 63% of the LEEP group and 72.1% of the CKC group. There was no significant difference in the proportion of negative residual disease (P > 0.05). The mean diameters of the base as well as the depth of the cone specimens were smaller in the LEEP group than in the CKC group (P < 0.05). The operating time in the LEEP group was significantly shorter than that of the CKC group (P < 0.05). Although thermal artifacts of margin were found in 8.2% of LEEP specimens, there was no difficulty in histological interpretation. Furthermore, the postoperative complications were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study demonstrate that the LEEP is a convenient, safe, and effective treatment for the management of cervical dysplasia. Cone specimens obtained during LEEP are adequate for thorough histological evaluation of cervical dysplasia. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10094873     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  7 in total

Review 1.  Early cervical neoplasia: advances in screening and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Brent Tierney; Shannon N Westin; Matthew P Schlumbrecht; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-08

2.  High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia After Negative Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.

Authors:  Lindsay M Kuroki; Laura James-Nywening; Ningying Wu; Jingxia Liu; Matthew A Powell; Premal H Thaker; L Stewart Massad
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 3.  Are treatments for cervical precancerous lesions in less-developed countries safe enough to promote scaling-up of cervical screening programs? A systematic review.

Authors:  Eric Chamot; Sibylle Kristensen; Jeffrey S A Stringer; Mulindi H Mwanahamuntu
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  The accuracy of cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis with loop electrosurgical excisional procedure under colposcopic vision.

Authors:  Komsun Suwannarurk; Sutatip Bhamarapravati; Yuthadej Thaweekul; Karicha Mairaing; Yenrudee Poomtavorn; Junya Pattaraarchachai
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  Meta-analysis of cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Yan-Ming Jiang; Chang-Xian Chen; Li Li
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Residual disease and risk factors in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and positive margins after initial conization.

Authors:  Yunfeng Fu; Chen Chen; Suwen Feng; Xiaodong Cheng; Xinyu Wang; Xing Xie; Weiguo Lü
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review.

Authors:  Yamilée Hurtado-Roca; Naysha Becerra-Chauca; Magaly Malca
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.106

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.