BACKGROUND: The lactulose/rhamnose (L/R) intestinal permeability test is widely used. However, different quantities and proportions of lactulose and rhamnose are used. The aim of this study was to determine whether a low dosage of lactulose is able to discriminate between normal and increased permeability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups of 10 healthy subjects were studied. In group 1, three different iso-osmolar test solutions were administered on 3 days. The solutions consisted of 10 g of L with 1 g of R, 5 g of L with 0.5 g of R and 1 g of L with 0.1 g of R in 65 mL of water. Group 2 ingested these solutions 1 h after ingestion of 750 mg of chenodeoxycholeic acid (CDCA), which is known to increase permeability. The urinary L/R ratio was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. Data are presented as medians (range). RESULTS: In group 1, no differences were observed between the three solutions. In Group 2, there was a significant difference (P = 0.045) between the three solutions. The L/R ratios were 0.0079 (0.0024-0.0152) (1L to 0.1R), 0.0138 (0.0066-0.0192) (5L to 0.5R) and 0.0144 (0.0074-0.0374) (10L to 1R). The L/R ratio differed significantly between Groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.001) using the 5L to 0.5R and 10L to 1R solutions respectively. CONCLUSION: If the permeability is increased, the urinary L/R ratio depends on the quantity of lactulose and rhamnose administered in equal proportion. 5L to 0.5R is sufficient to discriminate between a normal and a moderately increased permeability.
BACKGROUND: The lactulose/rhamnose (L/R) intestinal permeability test is widely used. However, different quantities and proportions of lactulose and rhamnose are used. The aim of this study was to determine whether a low dosage of lactulose is able to discriminate between normal and increased permeability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups of 10 healthy subjects were studied. In group 1, three different iso-osmolar test solutions were administered on 3 days. The solutions consisted of 10 g of L with 1 g of R, 5 g of L with 0.5 g of R and 1 g of L with 0.1 g of R in 65 mL of water. Group 2 ingested these solutions 1 h after ingestion of 750 mg of chenodeoxycholeic acid (CDCA), which is known to increase permeability. The urinary L/R ratio was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. Data are presented as medians (range). RESULTS: In group 1, no differences were observed between the three solutions. In Group 2, there was a significant difference (P = 0.045) between the three solutions. The L/R ratios were 0.0079 (0.0024-0.0152) (1L to 0.1R), 0.0138 (0.0066-0.0192) (5L to 0.5R) and 0.0144 (0.0074-0.0374) (10L to 1R). The L/R ratio differed significantly between Groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.001) using the 5L to 0.5R and 10L to 1R solutions respectively. CONCLUSION: If the permeability is increased, the urinary L/R ratio depends on the quantity of lactulose and rhamnose administered in equal proportion. 5L to 0.5R is sufficient to discriminate between a normal and a moderately increased permeability.
Authors: E Wilms; J Gerritsen; H Smidt; I Besseling-van der Vaart; G T Rijkers; A R Garcia Fuentes; A A M Masclee; F J Troost Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Martijn J L Bours; Hilde J Bos; Jon B Meddings; Robert-Jan M Brummer; Piet A van den Brandt; Pieter C Dagnelie Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2007-06-19 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Nalan Kayhan; Benjamin Funke; Lars Oliver Conzelmann; Harald Winkler; Stefan Hofer; Jochen Steppan; Heinfried Schmidt; Hubert Bardenheuer; Christian-Friedrich Vahl; Markus A Weigand Journal: Crit Care Date: 2008-10-13 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Saskia van Hemert; Anne C Breedveld; Jörgen M P Rovers; Jan P W Vermeiden; Ben J M Witteman; Marcel G Smits; Nicole M de Roos Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Peyman Mosberian-Tanha; Margareth Øverland; Thor Landsverk; Felipe E Reveco; Johan W Schrama; Andries J Roem; Jane W Agger; Liv T Mydland Journal: J Nutr Sci Date: 2016-06-06