Literature DB >> 10091663

Comparison of protein-protein interactions in serine protease-inhibitor and antibody-antigen complexes: implications for the protein docking problem.

R M Jackson1.   

Abstract

The protein-protein interaction energy of 12 nonhomologous serine protease-inhibitor and 15 antibody-antigen complexes is calculated using a molecular mechanics formalism and dissected in terms of the main-chain vs. side-chain contribution, nonrotameric side-chain contributions, and amino acid residue type involvement in the interface interaction. There are major differences in the interactions of the two types of protein-protein complex. Protease-inhibitor complexes interact predominantly through a main-chain-main-chain mechanism while antibody-antigen complexes interact predominantly through a side-chain-side-chain or a side-chain-main-chain mechanism. However, there is no simple correlation between the main-chain-main-chain interaction energy and the percentage of main-chain surface area buried on binding. The interaction energy is equally effected by the presence of nonrotameric side-chain conformations, which constitute approximately 20% of the interaction energy. The ability to reproduce the interface interaction energy of the crystal structure if original side-chain conformations are removed from the calculation is much greater in the protease-inhibitor complexes than the antibody-antigen complexes. The success of a rotameric model for protein-protein docking appears dependent on the extent of the main-chain-main-chain contribution to binding. Analysis of (1) residue type and (2) residue pair interactions at the interface show that antibody-antigen interactions are very restricted with over 70% of the antibody energy attributable to just six residue types (Tyr > Asp > Asn > Ser > Glu > Trp) in agreement with previous studies on residue propensity. However, it is found here that 50% of the antigen energy is attributable to just four residue types (Arg = Lys > Asn > Asp). On average just 12 residue pair interactions (6%) contribute over 40% of the favorable interaction energy in the antibody-antigen complexes, with charge-charge and charge/polar-tyrosine interactions being prominent. In contrast protease inhibitors use a diverse set of residue types and residue pair interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10091663      PMCID: PMC2144293          DOI: 10.1110/ps.8.3.603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  29 in total

1.  On the nature of antibody combining sites: unusual structural features that may confer on these sites an enhanced capacity for binding ligands.

Authors:  E A Padlan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1990

Review 2.  Structure, function and properties of antibody binding sites.

Authors:  I S Mian; A R Bradwell; A J Olson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-01-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Predictive docking of protein-protein and protein-DNA complexes.

Authors:  M J Sternberg; H A Gabb; R M Jackson
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures.

Authors:  F C Bernstein; T F Koetzle; G J Williams; E F Meyer; M D Brice; J R Rodgers; O Kennard; T Shimanouchi; M Tasumi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1977-05-25       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  On the attribution of binding energy in antigen-antibody complexes McPC 603, D1.3, and HyHEL-5.

Authors:  J Novotny; R E Bruccoleri; F A Saul
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1989-05-30       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes.

Authors:  J W Ponder; F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  A rapid method of calculating charge-charge interaction energies in proteins.

Authors:  R W Pickersgill
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1988-09

8.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility.

Authors:  B Lee; F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1971-02-14       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  Protein inhibitors of proteinases.

Authors:  M Laskowski; I Kato
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 23.643

10.  Picosecond dynamics of tyrosine side chains in proteins.

Authors:  J A McCammon; P G Wolynes; M Karplus
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1979-03-20       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  29 in total

1.  Characterization of a discontinuous epitope of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) core protein p24 by epitope excision and differential chemical modification followed by mass spectrometric peptide mapping analysis.

Authors:  E O Hochleitner; C Borchers; C Parker; R J Bienstock; K B Tomer
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Robert B Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility.

Authors:  Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Potential aggregation-prone regions in complementarity-determining regions of antibodies and their contribution towards antigen recognition: a computational analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoling Wang; Satish K Singh; Sandeep Kumar
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Functional mapping of the anti-idiotypic antibody anti-TS1 scFv using site-directed mutagenesis and kinetic analysis.

Authors:  Ann Erlandsson; Patrik Holm; Rozbeh Jafari; Torgny Stigbrand; Birgitta E Sundström
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

6.  Parallel synthesis of an oligomeric imidazole-4,5-dicarboxamide library.

Authors:  Zhigang Xu; John C DiCesare; Paul W Baures
Journal:  J Comb Chem       Date:  2010-03-08

7.  DARS (Decoys As the Reference State) potentials for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Gwo-Yu Chuang; Dima Kozakov; Ryan Brenke; Stephen R Comeau; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Contribution of asparagine residues to the stabilization of a proteinaceous antigen-antibody complex, HyHEL-10-hen egg white lysozyme.

Authors:  Akiko Yokota; Kouhei Tsumoto; Mitsunori Shiroishi; Takeshi Nakanishi; Hidemasa Kondo; Izumi Kumagai
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Design of Deinococcus radiodurans thioredoxin reductase with altered thioredoxin specificity using computational alanine mutagenesis.

Authors:  Josiah Obiero; David A R Sanders
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Immunogenicity of membrane-bound HIV-1 gp41 membrane-proximal external region (MPER) segments is dominated by residue accessibility and modulated by stereochemistry.

Authors:  Mikyung Kim; Likai Song; James Moon; Zhen-Yu J Sun; Anna Bershteyn; Melissa Hanson; Derek Cain; Selasie Goka; Garnett Kelsoe; Gerhard Wagner; Darrell Irvine; Ellis L Reinherz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.