Literature DB >> 10090868

Compliance with mammography guidelines: physician recommendation and patient adherence.

D S May1, C I Kiefe, E Funkhouser, M N Fouad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that women ages 50-75 years receive screening mammography every 1-2 years. We related receipt of physician recommendations for mammography and patient adherence to such recommendations to several patient characteristics.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 1,111 women ages 50-75 attending three clinics in an urban university medical center. We ascertained overall compliance with mammography guidelines and two components of compliance: receipt of a physician recommendation and adherence to a recommendation. Outcome measures were the proportion of patients demonstrating each type of compliance and adjusted odds ratios, according to several patient-related characteristics.
RESULTS: Overall, 66% of women received a recommendation. Of women receiving a documented recommendation, 75% adhered. Factors showing significant positive associations with receiving a recommendation included being a patient in the general internal medicine clinic, having private insurance, visiting the clinic more often, and having a recent Pap smear. Patient adherence was positively associated with private insurance and Pap smear history, negatively associated with internal medicine, and not associated with visit frequency.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient factors influencing physician mammography recommendations may be different from those associated with patient adherence, except for having private health insurance, which was a predictor of both. Copyright 1999 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10090868     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  20 in total

Review 1.  Paved with good intentions: do public health and human service providers contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in health?

Authors:  Michelle van Ryn; Steven S Fu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The influence of breast self-examination on subsequent mammography participation.

Authors:  Susan E Jelinski; Colleen J Maxwell; Jay Onysko; Christina M Bancej
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The demographic, system, and psychosocial origins of mammographic screening disparities: prediction of initiation versus maintenance screening among immigrant and non-immigrant women.

Authors:  Nathan S Consedine
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-08

Review 4.  The impact of health information technology on cancer care across the continuum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Will L Tarver; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Breast cancer risk and provider recommendation for mammography among recently unscreened women in the United States.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Risa B Burns; Roger B Davis; Russell S Phillips; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Predisposing, Enabling, and Reinforcing Factors Associated with Mammography Referrals in U.S. Primary Care Practices.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Trevor Thompson; Steven S Coughlin; Susan M Schappert
Journal:  Open Health Serv Policy J       Date:  2009-01-01

7.  Intention to receive cancer screening in Native Americans from the Northern Plains.

Authors:  Nancy Pandhi; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Shalini Kanekar; Daniel G Petereit; Chitra Karki; Maureen A Smith
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Prevalence of colorectal cancer screening among a multimorbid rural Appalachian population.

Authors:  Steven T Fleming; Nancy E Schoenberg; Yelena N Tarasenko; Kevin A Pearce
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.954

9.  Explaining variations in breast cancer screening across European countries.

Authors:  Ansgar Wübker
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-06-07

10.  Self-report versus medical records for assessing cancer-preventive services delivery.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Karissa A Hahn; Shawna V Hudson; Eric K Shaw; Jesse C Crosson; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.