Literature DB >> 10090799

Goals as reference points.

C Heath1, R P Larrick, G Wu.   

Abstract

We argue that goals serve as reference points and alter outcomes in a manner consistent with the value function of Prospect Theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Tversky & Kahneman, 1992). We present new evidence that goals inherit the properties of the value function-not only a reference point, but also loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity. We also use the value function to explain previous empirical results in the goal literature on affect, effort, persistence, and performance. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10090799     DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  26 in total

Review 1.  Counterfactual thinking and decision making.

Authors:  N Roese
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

2.  Using the lessons of behavioral economics to design more effective pay-for-performance programs.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Melony E S Sorbero; Cheryl L Damberg
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  From primed concepts to action: A meta-analysis of the behavioral effects of incidentally presented words.

Authors:  Evan Weingarten; Qijia Chen; Maxwell McAdams; Jessica Yi; Justin Hepler; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  The Effect of Providing Peer Information on Retirement Savings Decisions.

Authors:  John Beshears; James J Choi; David Laibson; Brigitte C Madrian; Katherine L Milkman
Journal:  J Finance       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 5.  Economic evaluation of pay-for-performance in health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Frank Eijkenaar; Heike Kemter; Adelheid Susanne Esslinger; Oliver Schöffski
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-10

6.  Holding the Hunger Games Hostage at the Gym: An Evaluation of Temptation Bundling.

Authors:  Katherine L Milkman; Julia A Minson; Kevin G M Volpp
Journal:  Manage Sci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.883

7.  Anchor effects in decision making can be reduced by the interaction between goal monitoring and the level of the decision maker's executive functions.

Authors:  Johannes Schiebener; Elisa Wegmann; Mirko Pawlikowski; Matthias Brand
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08-23

8.  Small Cues Change Savings Choices.

Authors:  James J Choi; Emily Haisley; Jennifer Kurkoski; Cade Massey
Journal:  J Econ Behav Organ       Date:  2017-08-24

Review 9.  Using insights from behavioral economics and social psychology to help patients manage chronic diseases.

Authors:  Braden K Mogler; Suzanne B Shu; Craig R Fox; Noah J Goldstein; Ronald G Victor; José J Escarce; Martin F Shapiro
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  The 'Downside' of Women Empowerment in India: An Experimental Inquiry into the Role of Expectations.

Authors:  Luuk van Kempen
Journal:  Soc Indic Res       Date:  2009-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.