Literature DB >> 10089845

Impact of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial on implantable cardioverter defibrillator indication trends.

S L Higgins1.   

Abstract

Since publication of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) in 1996, indications for implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have expanded. Initial criticisms of the study have been addressed, including the need to await the conclusion of several additional ICD clinical trials. These other trials have generally shown an improved survival with ICD therapy when compared with antiarrhythmic agents. As a result, ICD implantation volumes have increased worldwide. However, ICD usage has regional variation with 120 implants per million population in the United States, 45 per million in Germany, but only 7 and 8 per million in France and the United Kingdom, respectively. Although many factors affect implant decisions, reimbursement issues are particularly important. Other factors may explain the slower growth in Europe when compared with the United States including greater skepticism regarding MADIT, less industry-sponsored marketing, and lack of unified cardiology society support for the MADIT recommendations. Nevertheless, it is anticipated that > 50,000 ICDs have been implanted worldwide in 1998, with a growing percentage in the countries of Europe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10089845     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)01007-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

Review 1.  Are drugs and catheter ablation effective for treating ventricular arrhythmias in populations that cannot afford implantable cardioverter defibrillators?

Authors:  K K Talwar; N Naik; R Juneja
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Implantable dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator-pacemaker.

Authors:  D Pfeiffer; M Mende; A Hagendorff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Implementation of MADIT and MUSTT in clinical practice: results of an international survey.

Authors:  Seah Nisam; Sophie Henry; David J Wilber
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Impact of alternative medical device approval processes on costs and health.

Authors:  Benjamin P George; Vinayak Venkataraman; E Ray Dorsey; S Claiborne Johnston
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  What evidence do we have to replace in-hospital implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up?

Authors:  P Brugada
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  The role of remote monitoring in the reduction of inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies.

Authors:  J C J Res; D A M J Theuns; L Jordaens
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 7.  Devices for the management of ventricular arrhythmias in cardiac failure.

Authors:  Michael Cooklin
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.214

8.  The use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in Iceland: a retrospective population based study.

Authors:  Margret Leosdottir; Gudrun Reimarsdottir; Gizur Gottskalksson; Bjarni Torfason; Margret Vigfusdottir; David O Arnar
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 2.298

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.