Literature DB >> 10089763

Attentional localization prior to simple and directed manual responses.

T L Hodgson1, H J Müller, M J O'Leary.   

Abstract

The relationship between attention and the programming of motor responses was investigated, using a paradigm in which the onsets of targets for movements were preceded by peripheral attentional cues. Simple (button release) and reaching manual responses were compared under conditions in which the subjects either made saccades toward the target location or refrained from making eye movements. The timing of the movement onset was used as the dependent measure for both simple and reaching manual responses. Eye movement latencies were also measured. A follow-up experiment measured the effect of the same peripheral cuing procedure on purely visual processes, using signal detection measures of visual sensitivity and response bias. The results of the first experiment showed that reaction time (RT) increased with the distance between the cued and the target locations. Stronger distance effects were observed when goal-directed responses were required, which suggests enhanced attentional localization of target positions under these conditions. The requirement to generate an eye movement response was found to delay simple manual RTs. However, mean reaching RTs were unaffected by the eye movement condition. Distance gradients on eye movement latencies were relatively shallow, as compared with those on goal-directed manual responses. The second experiment showed that the peripheral cue had only a very small effect on visual detection sensitivity in the absence of directed motor responses. It is concluded that cue-target distance effects with peripheral cues are modulated by the motor-programming requirements of the task. The effect of the peripheral cue on eye movement latencies was qualitatively different from that observed on manual RTs, indicating the existence of separate neural representations underlying both response types. At the same time, the interactions between response modalities are consistent with a supramodal representation of attentional space, within which different motor programs may interact.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10089763     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  7 in total

1.  Time-dependent effects of discrete spatial cues on the planning of directed movements.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pellizzer; James H Hedges; Ramon R Villanueva
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Spatial distribution of visual attention: perceptual sensitivity and response latency.

Authors:  T C Handy; A Kingstone; G R Mangun
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-05

3.  Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays.

Authors:  H J Müller; A von Mühlenen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

Review 4.  The role of saccades in multitasking: towards an output-related view of eye movements.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-01

5.  Stopping eyes and hands: evidence for non-independence of stop and go processes and for a separation of central and peripheral inhibition.

Authors:  Alessandro Gulberti; Petra A Arndt; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction.

Authors:  Harriet Goschy; Sarolta Bakos; Hermann J Müller; Michael Zehetleitner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-06

7.  Interaction of oculomotor and manual behavior: evidence from simulated driving in an approach-avoidance steering task.

Authors:  Norbert Schneider; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-06-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.