Literature DB >> 10088934

Predischarge monitoring of preterm infants.

N M Razi1, J Humphreys, P B Pandit, G E Stahl.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were: 1) to perform documented event-monitoring (DEM) for apnea (A, > or = 20 s) and bradycardia (B, < 80 beats per min for > or = 5 s) in premature infants prior to discharge, and 2) to examine the accuracy of nursing documentation (ND) of A and B. Forty-four stable preterm infants, with mean weights and gestational ages at birth (+/- SD) of 1,543 (+/- 365) g, and 30 (+/- 2) weeks, respectively, were studied using DEM for 9 (+/- 2) days prior to discharge. Differences in DEM and ND were analyzed by the z-test for proportions. There were 561 true events recorded by DEM: 56 were As and 505 were Bs. ND revealed 296 events, 190 As and 106 Bs. Of the 56 true As on DEM, only 21 (38%) were correctly reported by ND (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.81). Of the 505 true Bs on DEM, 153 (30%) were correctly reported by ND (P < 0.001, CI 0.63-0.76). When ND was compared with DEM, 174 (59%) of NDs were true events. Of the 106 As on ND, only 21 (20%) were true As on DEM (P < 0.001, CI 0.58-1). Of the 190 Bs on ND, 153 (80%) were true Bs on DEM (P < 0.001, CI 0.13-0.26). ND did not detect 6 of the 33 infants who had significant events on DEM, while 4 of the 11 who had events reported on ND did not have any on DEM. Thus, 10 infants were misclassified by ND (P < 0.01, CI 0.1-0.36). These results indicate that, compared to DEM, ND not only identified significantly fewer true As and Bs, but also misclassified a significant number of infants. We conclude that DEM performed prior to discharge for preterm infants at risk for apnea and bradycardia provides more objective and accurate information than ND.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10088934     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199902)27:2<113::aid-ppul7>3.0.co;2-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol        ISSN: 1099-0496


  5 in total

Review 1.  Risks and benefits of therapies for apnoea in premature infants.

Authors:  J M Hascoet; I Hamon; M J Boutroy
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Monitoring apnea of prematurity: validity of nursing documentation and bedside cardiorespiratory monitor.

Authors:  Sanjiv B Amin; Erica Burnell
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Accurate automated apnea analysis in preterm infants.

Authors:  Brooke D Vergales; Alix O Paget-Brown; Hoshik Lee; Lauren E Guin; Terri J Smoot; Craig G Rusin; Matthew T Clark; John B Delos; Karen D Fairchild; Douglas E Lake; Randall Moorman; John Kattwinkel
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Risk of cardio-respiratory abnormalities in preterm infants placed in car seats: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Vallier C Ojadi; Anna Petrova; Rajeev Mehta; Thomas Hegyi
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  New method to measure interbreath intervals in infants for the assessment of apnoea and respiration.

Authors:  Ryan Purdy; João Jorge; Tricia Adjei; Eleri Adams; Miranda Buckle; Ria Evans Fry; Gabrielle Green; Chetan Patel; Richard Rogers; Rebeccah Slater; Lionel Tarassenko; Mauricio Villarroel; Caroline Hartley
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2021-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.