Literature DB >> 10087395

Conventional CT signs in staging transitional cell tumors of the upper urinary tract.

F Millán-Rodríguez1, J Palou, P de la Torre-Holguera, J M Vayreda-Martija, H Villavicencio-Mavrich, J Vicente-Rodríguez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine conventional computed tomography (CT) signs in the diagnosis and staging of upper urinary tract tumors (UUTTs).
METHODS: Retrospective study was made of the CTs of 82 patients diagnosed with UUTTs. Nine CT signs were defined and compared with the pathology of the surgical specimen. A chi2 test was used for statistical analyses.
RESULTS: We reviewed the CTs of 93 UUTTs in 82 patients, of which 36% were invasive and 12% had positive lymph nodes. Renal parenchymal invasion was found in 82% of high-grade and in 18% of low-grade tumors (p = 0.001). 94% of the tumors with signs of renal parenchymal invasion were invasive (p < 0.001), as well as 88% of those appearing as renal masses (p = 0.005), with a global sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 97%. The CT sensitivity and specificity of detecting infiltration of the ureter was 67 and 77%, respectively, and no sign was statistically significant. The detection of lymph node involvement had a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 98%.
CONCLUSIONS: CT offers good sensitivity (87.5%) and specificity (98%) in the detection of lymph node involvement, and 64% sensitivity and 97% specificity for the detection of renal tumor invasion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10087395     DOI: 10.1159/000019869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  5 in total

1.  Radiolabelled choline and FDG PET/CT: two alternatives for the assessment of lymph node metastases in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Fabio Zattoni; Laura Evangelista; Andrea Guttilla; Filiberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

Authors:  Francesco Soria; Shahrokh F Shariat; Seth P Lerner; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Michael Rink; Wassim Kassouf; Philippe E Spiess; Yair Lotan; Dingwei Ye; Mario I Fernández; Eiji Kikuchi; Daher C Chade; Marko Babjuk; Arthur P Grollman; George N Thalmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Risk Stratification of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Patients for Survival Prediction: A Simple Summation Scoring Method.

Authors:  Li-Jen Wang; Wen-Chi Chou; See-Tong Pang; Chih-Wei Yang; Cheng-Keng Chuang; Ying-Hsu Chang; Ming-Li Hsieh; Yon-Cheong Wong
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Prognostic impact of perirenal fat stranding on oncologic outcomes in ureteral urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jae Wook Chung; Jun Nyung Lee; Kyong Min Park; Kyeong Hyeon Byeon; Hyejin Cheon; Yun Sok Ha; Seock Hwan Choi; Bum Soo Kim; Tae Hwan Kim; Eun Sang Yoo; Tae Gyun Kwon; Hyun Tae Kim
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2020-12-09

Review 5.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy before Nephroureterectomy in High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  David Oswald; Maximilian Pallauf; Susanne Deininger; Peter Törzsök; Manuela Sieberer; Christian Eiben
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 6.575

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.