Literature DB >> 10082834

Gender effects on odor-stimulated functional magnetic resonance imaging.

D M Yousem1, J A Maldjian, F Siddiqi, T Hummel, D C Alsop, R J Geckle, W B Bilker, R L Doty.   

Abstract

On standardized tests of odor identification and odor detection, women tend to score better than men at nearly all age groups. We sought to determine if these findings would translate to differences between the sexes in the volume of activated brain when odors are presented to subjects as the stimulants for functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) experiments. The activation maps of eight right-handed women (mean age 25.3 years old, range 20-44, S.D. 8.3 years) were compared with those of 8 right-handed men (mean age 30.5, range 18-37, S.D. 6.5 years) given the same olfactory nerve stimuli in an FMRI experiment at 1.5 T. Olfactory stimuli were delivered to the patients in a passive fashion using a Burghart OM4-B olfactometer with a nose piece inserted into the patients' nostrils. We used agents (eugenol, phenyl ethyl alcohol, or phenyl ethyl alcohol alternating with hydrogen sulfide) that were selective for olfactory nerve stimulation in the nose. The odorants were delivered to both nostrils for 1 s every 4 s during a 30 s 'on-period'. During the 30 s 'off-period', the patient received room air at the same flow rate. The women's group-averaged activation maps showed up to eight times more activated voxels than men for specific regions of the brain (frontal and perisylvian regions). The left and right inferior frontal regions showed a statistically significant increase in activation in women at p<0.01. In general, more women showed activation than men. The results suggest that (1) FMRI activation maps in subject groups can demonstrate correlates to psychophysical tests of olfaction, and (2) one must control for gender when performing odor-stimulated FMRI experiments. Copyright 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10082834     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)01276-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  24 in total

1.  MR evaluation in patients with isolated anosmia since birth or early childhood.

Authors:  Nasreddin D Abolmaali; Volker Hietschold; Thomas J Vogl; Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Why should neuroradiologists study patients with smell loss?

Authors:  Lucien M Levy; Robert I Henkin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Stimulus selection for intranasal sensory isolation: eugenol is an irritant.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Charles J Wysocki; Johan N Lundström
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Quantifying the lagged Poincaré plot geometry of ultrashort heart rate variability series: automatic recognition of odor hedonic tone.

Authors:  M Nardelli; G Valenza; A Greco; A Lanatá; E P Scilingo; R Bailón
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Males and females show differential brain activation to taste when hungry and sated in gustatory and reward areas.

Authors:  Lori Haase; Erin Green; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 6.  Olfactory function in psychotic disorders: Insights from neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Kimberley P Good; Randii Lynn Sullivan
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06-22

7.  Volume of olfactory bulb and depth of olfactory sulcus in 378 consecutive patients with olfactory loss.

Authors:  Thomas Hummel; Antje Urbig; Caroline Huart; Thierry Duprez; Philippe Rombaux
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Visualization of the olfactory nerve using constructive interference in steady state magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Satoshi Tsutsumi; Hideo Ono; Yukimasa Yasumoto
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  A Free-breathing fMRI Method to Study Human Olfactory Function.

Authors:  Jianli Wang; Sebastian Rupprecht; Xiaoyu Sun; Diana Freiberg; Courtney Crowell; Emma Cartisano; Megha Vasavada; Qing X Yang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 10.  Sex differences and reproductive hormone influences on human odor perception.

Authors:  Richard L Doty; E Leslie Cameron
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.