Literature DB >> 10075260

The effect of independent collimator misalignment on the dosimetry of abutted half-beam blocked fields for the treatment of head and neck cancer.

D I Rosenthal1, J McDonough, A Kassaee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Independent collimation conveniently allows for the junctioning of abutting fields with non-diverging beam edges. When this technique is used at the junction of multiple fields, e.g. lateral and low anterior fields in three-field head and neck set-ups, there should be a dosimetric match with no overdose or underdose at the matchline. We set out to evaluate the actual dosimetry at the central match plane.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Independent jaws were used to mimic two half-beam blocked fields abutting at the central axis. X-Ray verification film was exposed in a water-equivalent phantom and the dose at the matchline was evaluated with laser densitometry. Collimators were then programmed to force a gap or overlap of the radiation fields to evaluate the effect of jaw misalignment within the tolerance of the manufacturer's specification. Diode measurements of the field edges were also performed. Four beam energies from four different linear accelerators were evaluated.
RESULTS: Small systematic inhomogeneities were found along the matchline in all linear accelerators tested. The maximum dose on the central axis varied linearly with small programmed jaw misalignments. For a gap or overlap of 2 mm between the jaws, the matchline dose increased or decreased by 30-40%. The region of overdose or underdose around the matchline is 3-4 mm wide. The discrepancy between the width of jaw separation and the width of the region of altered dose is explained by a penumbra effect.
CONCLUSION: We recommend that independent jaw alignment be evaluated routinely and provide a simple method to estimate dose inhomogeneity at the match plane. If there is a field gap or overlap resulting in a clinically significant change in dosimetry, jaw misalignment should be corrected. If it cannot be corrected, part of the benefit of asymmetric collimation is lost and other methods of field junctioning may have to be considered. We routinely use a small block over the spinal cord at the mono-isocenter set-up plane for three-field head and neck treatments to prevent an overdose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10075260     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(98)00128-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  6 in total

1.  Use of a conventional low neck field (LNF) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT): no clinical detriment of IMRT to an anterior LNF during the treatment of head-and neck-cancer.

Authors:  Aruna Turaka; Tianyu Li; Nicos Nicolaou; Miriam N Lango; Barbara Burtness; Eric M Horwitz; John A Ridge; Steven J Feigenberg
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Comparison of target coverage and dose to organs at risk between simultaneous integrated-boost whole-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy and junctioned intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a conventional radiotherapy field in treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jin-Beom Chung; Jeong-Woo Lee; Jae-Sung Kim; In-Ah Kim; Doo-Hyun Lee; Yon-Lae Kim; Kyoung-Sik Choi; Bo-Young Choe; Tae-Suk Suh
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-05-10

3.  An opposed matched field IMRT technique for prostate cancer patients with bilateral prosthetic hips.

Authors:  Shahin Fattahi; Orest Z Ostapiak
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  MLC-based penumbra softener of EDW borders to reduce junction inhomogeneities.

Authors:  Stanislaw Szpala; Kirpal Kohli
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Dosimetric and mechanical equivalency of Varian TrueBeam linear accelerators.

Authors:  Mohammed Ghazal; Lars Södergren; Mathias Westermark; Julia Söderström; Tobias Pommer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Effect of interfractional shoulder motion on low neck nodal targets for patients treated using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

Authors:  Kevin E Casey; Pei-Fong Wong; Samuel S Tung
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.