Literature DB >> 10074979

Postpartum regression rates of antepartum cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II and III lesions.

N P Yost1, J T Santoso, D D McIntire, F A Iliya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the histologic regression and progression rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II and III after delivery and the effect the route of delivery has on the regression rates of CIN.
METHODS: Pregnant patients with satisfactory colposcopic examinations and biopsy-proven CIN II and III were identified. Delivery information and postpartum biopsy results were obtained by chart review.
RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-nine patients had antepartum biopsies of CIN II or CIN III. Of these, 126 women were excluded for the following reasons: lost to follow-up (75), human immunodeficiency virus positive (two), cesarean hysterectomy (four), and inadequate postpartum follow-up (45). This yielded a study group of 153 patients consisting of 82 with CIN II and 71 with CIN III. The regression rates were 68% and 70% among CIN II and CIN III patients (P = .78), respectively. Seven percent of patients with CIN II progressed to CIN III on postpartum evaluation. Twenty-five percent of those patients with CIN II and 30% of those with CIN III remained the same postpartum. No CIN lesions progressed to invasive carcinoma. There were no differences in regression rates or progression rates among the women who had vaginal deliveries (130), women who labored and then underwent cesarean (17), or women who proceeded to a cesarean without laboring (six).
CONCLUSION: We found similar high postpartum regression rates despite the route of delivery. We recommend conservative antepartum management with postpartum colposcopic evaluation regardless of route of delivery because we are unable to predict which of these lesions are more likely to regress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10074979     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00483-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  15 in total

1.  Cervical cancer in pregnant women: treat, wait or interrupt? Assessment of current clinical guidelines, innovations and controversies.

Authors:  Sileny N Han; Mina Mhallem Gziri; Kristel Van Calsteren; Frédéric Amant
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 8.168

2.  Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pregnancy: Interference of pregnancy status with p16 and Ki-67 protein expression.

Authors:  Andrea Ciavattini; Francesco Sopracordevole; Jacopo Di Giuseppe; Lorenzo Moriconi; Guendalina Lucarini; Francesca Mancioli; Antonio Zizzi; Gaia Goteri
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Characterization and clinical management of abnormal cytology findings in pregnant women: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Rosa Freudenreich; Martin Weiss; Tobias Engler; Felix Neis; Melanie Henes
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: development during pregnancy and postpartum.

Authors:  Frederik A Stuebs; Franziska Mergel; Martin C Koch; Anna K Dietl; Carla E Schulmeyer; Werner Adler; Carol Geppert; Arndt Hartman; Antje Knöll; Matthias W Beckmann; Paul Gass; Grit Mehlhorn
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Prevalence, risk factors, and pregnancy outcomes of cervical cell abnormalities in the puerperium in a hyperendemic HIV setting.

Authors:  Hopolang C Maise; Dhayendre Moodley; Motshedisi Sebitloane; Suzanne Maman; Benn Sartorius
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Course of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed during pregnancy.

Authors:  Donata Grimm; Isabelle Lang; Katharina Prieske; Anna Jaeger; Volkmar Müller; Sascha Kuerti; Eike Burandt; Susanne Lezius; Barbara Schmalfeldt; Linn Woelber
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus and Genotype Distribution in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women in China.

Authors:  Dandan Luo; Meilian Peng; Xizhen Wei; Diling Pan; Huifeng Xue; Yuying Xu; Binhua Dong
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-07-28

8.  High-risk human papillomavirus clearance in pregnant women: trends for lower clearance during pregnancy with a catch-up postpartum.

Authors:  M A E Nobbenhuis; T J M Helmerhorst; A J C van den Brule; L Rozendaal; P D Bezemer; F J Voorhorst; C J L M Meijer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Risk of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection and Cervical Neoplasia after Pregnancy.

Authors:  Helen Trottier; Marie-Hélène Mayrand; Maria Luiza Baggio; Lenice Galan; Alex Ferenczy; Luisa L Villa; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Gynecologic malignancy in pregnancy.

Authors:  Yong Il Ji; Ki Tae Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2013-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.