Literature DB >> 10073748

Cough and angiotensin II receptor antagonists: cause or confounding?

F J Mackay1, G L Pearce, R D Mann.   

Abstract

AIMS: Cough is one of the most frequent side effects associated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) but is not thought to be associated with losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARA). This study compares reports of cough with losartan and three ACEIs used in general practice.
METHODS: Studies have been conducted for losartan, and three ACEIs enalapril, lisinopril and perindopril, using the technique of Prescription-Event Monitoring. Patients were identified using dispensed prescription data. Questionnaires were sent to patients' general practitioners 6 months after the date of first prescription. Cases of cough within the first 60 days of treatment with losartan resulting in withdrawal of the drug were followed up with additional questionnaires. Incidence rates for reports of cough were calculated. In order to reduce the impact of carry-over effects, rate ratios were calculated for first reports of cough between days 8 and 60 using losartan as the index drug.
RESULTS: The cohort for each drug exceeded 9000 patients. Age and sex distributions and indications for prescribing the four drugs were similar. Cough was the most frequent reason for discontinuation of losartan and the most frequently reported event in the first month of treatment with this drug. When reports of cough between days 1-7 were excluded, rates of cough were significantly higher for the three ACEIs when compared with losartan (rate ratios 1.5, 4.8 and 5.7, all P<0.03). 101 patients had discontinued losartan due to cough. 91% of these had previously been prescribed an ACEI and 86% had previously experienced ACEI cough.
CONCLUSIONS: Carry-over accounted for the observed excess of reports of cough with losartan. Rates of cough between days 8 and 60 were significantly higher for the three ACEIs compared with losartan. Confounding factors associated with comparative observational cohort studies are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10073748      PMCID: PMC2014204          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00855.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  4 in total

1.  Prescription-event monitoring (PEM) in 1996-a method of non-interventional observational cohort pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  R D Mann; L V Wilton; G L Pearce; F J Mackay; N R Dunn
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  A comparison of fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, sertraline and paroxetine examined by observational cohort studies.

Authors:  F J Mackay; N R Dunn; L V Wilton; G L Pearce; S N Freemantle; R D Mann
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II antagonists and cough. The Losartan Cough Study Group.

Authors:  L E Ramsay; W W Yeo
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 4.  Modulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and cough.

Authors:  Y Lacourcière; J Lefebvre
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.223

  4 in total
  18 in total

Review 1.  Risk-benefit ratio of angiotensin antagonists versus ACE inhibitors in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  D A Sica; T W Gehr; A Fernandez
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Updated report on comparative effectiveness of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and direct renin inhibitors for patients with essential hypertension: much more data, little new information.

Authors:  Benjamin J Powers; Remy R Coeytaux; Rowena J Dolor; Vic Hasselblad; Uptal D Patel; William S Yancy; Rebecca N Gray; R Julian Irvine; Amy S Kendrick; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Compliance and persistence with newer antihypertensive agents.

Authors:  William C Gerth
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  [Female patients with arterial hypertension].

Authors:  A Mitchell; T Philipp
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Comparison of losartan with ACE inhibitors and dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists: a pilot study of prescription-event monitoring in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuo Samizo; Eri Kawabe; Shiro Hinotsu; Tsugumichi Sato; Shigeru Kageyama; Chikuma Hamada; Yasuo Ohashi; Kiyoshi Kubota
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Pharmacogenomics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: interaction with biological differences between men and women.

Authors:  Flavia Franconi; Ilaria Campesi
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  [Sex differences in cardiovascular drug targeting].

Authors:  V Regitz-Zagrosek; C Schubert; S Krüger
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 8.  [Heart failure--are there gender aspects?].

Authors:  V Regitz-Zagrosek; E Lehmkuhl; H B Lehmkuhl
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.743

9.  Sex- and Gender-Based Pharmacological Response to Drugs.

Authors:  Franck Mauvais-Jarvis; Heiner K Berthold; Ilaria Campesi; Juan-Jesus Carrero; Santosh Dakal; Flavia Franconi; Ioanna Gouni-Berthold; Mark L Heiman; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Sabra L Klein; Anne Murphy; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek; Karen Reue; Joshua B Rubin
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 10.  Influence of sex hormones and phytoestrogens on heart disease in men and women.

Authors:  Poornima Bhupathy; Christopher Dean Haines; Leslie Anne Leinwand
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2010-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.