Literature DB >> 10073511

Comparison of three single doses of mifepristone as emergency contraception: a randomised trial. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mifepristone is a highly effective and well-tolerated emergency contraceptive when given in a dose of 600 mg within 72 h of unprotected coitus. We assessed whether the same effectiveness can be achieved with lower doses of mifepristone (50 mg and 10 mg) and a longer postcoital treatment period (120 h).
METHODS: We undertook a multicentre, single-masked, randomised trial in 11 family-planning clinics in Australia, China, Finland, Georgia, the UK, and the USA. 1717 healthy women with regular menstrual cycles who requested emergency contraception within 120 h of unprotected coitus were randomly assigned to three treatment groups.
FINDINGS: 32 women were lost to follow-up and one was pregnant before treatment. The 600 mg, 50 mg, and 10 mg groups did not differ in the proportions of pregnancies (seven [1.3%] of 559, six [1.1%] of 560, and seven [1.2%] of 565). Two pregnancies (both in the 50 mg group) were tubal. Among women without further acts of intercourse, treatment delay did not appear to influence the effectiveness. No major side-effects occurred, except a delay in the onset of next menses, significantly (p<.001) related to the mifepristone dose.
INTERPRETATION: Lowering the dose of mifepristone sixty-fold did not decrease its effectiveness as an emergency contraceptive under typical use, though a study of this size cannot exclude differences in effectiveness up to almost three-fold. Lower doses of mifepristone were associated with less disturbance of the menstrual cycle. Thus, a dose as low as 10 mg seems preferable to the 600 mg dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10073511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  20 in total

Review 1.  [Emergency contraception].

Authors:  I Lete Lasa; M Arróniz; R Esquisábel
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Post-rape care in hospital emergency rooms.

Authors:  J M Goldenring; G Allred
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Emergency contraception.

Authors:  M Cole
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  How safe is emergency contraception?

Authors:  Abigail Norris Turner; Charlotte Ellertson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Proven and potential clinical applications of mifpristone (RU486).

Authors:  Irving M Spitz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 6.  Ectopic pregnancy and emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kelly Cleland; Elizabeth Raymond; James Trussell; Linan Cheng; Haoping Zhu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Emergency contraceptive options available for adolescents.

Authors:  Vishal Gupta; Ran D Goldman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 8.  The regulation of embryo implantation and endometrial decidualization by progesterone receptor signaling.

Authors:  Michael J Large; Francesco J DeMayo
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 4.102

9.  Progesterone receptor modulator for emergency contraception: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mitchell D Creinin; William Schlaff; David F Archer; Livia Wan; Ron Frezieres; Michael Thomas; Michael Rosenberg; James Higgins
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Hormonal contraception in adolescents: special considerations.

Authors:  Rollyn M Ornstein; Martin M Fisher
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.