Literature DB >> 10071979

Pharmacokinetics of oral etoposide in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

P Aita1, I Robieux, R Sorio, S Tumolo, G Corona, R Cannizzaro, A M Colussi, M Boiocchi, G Toffoli.   

Abstract

Etoposide dosage in patients with liver dysfunction remains controversial. Since etoposide has a hepatic component to its clearance (CL) and shows a high degree of protein binding, hepatic impairment could affect etoposide disposition. However, the empiric recommendation that the dose of etoposide be decreased in such patients may reduce systemic exposure and be detrimental to its antitumor activity. To address these issues we studied the pharmacokinetics (PK) of etoposide in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and underlying cirrhosis (n = 17) treated with daily oral etoposide. Unbound etoposide was obtained by ultrafiltration. Etoposide concentrations (total and free drug) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and analyzed by noncompartmental equations. The patients had mild or moderate liver dysfunction. Albuminemia was in the normal range for all the patients. Creatininemia was normal in all but two patients. PK results (mean and range) showed that etoposide disposition was unchanged in patients with liver dysfunction. We found slightly high etoposide bioavailability [F, 61% (17-95%)] and clearance [CL, 1.1 (0.7-2.3)l h(-1) m(-2)] resulting in a normal degree of systemic exposure (AUC(oral) 27 microg h ml(-1)). Normal protein binding [PB 93.2% (84.4-98.1%)] contributed to a normal level of exposure to free drug (AUC(f, oral) 1.9 microg h ml(-1)). The distribution volume [V(SS) 8.4 (6.1-13.2) l/m2] and the effective half-life [t1/2eff, 5.1 (3.0-9.6) h] were normal. Median CL and protein binding did not differ in the seven patients with total bilirubin value of > 1.2 mg/dl as compared with the ten patients with total bilirubin levels of < or = 1.2 mg/dl (1.3 versus 1.01 h(-1) m(-2) and 92.5% versus 93.4%, respectively). In agreement with this PK finding, we observed no clinical evidence of increased toxicity in patients with hyperbilirubinemia as compared with patients with normal bilirubinemia (mean WBC decrease 38% versus 47%). The only case of severe (grade 4) hematological toxicity was observed in one patient with reduced glomerular filtration. Since the pharmacological effects of etoposide correlate with the level of systemic exposure to the free drug, our data suggest that no dose reduction is needed in patients with HCC. It is even possible to increase the dose intensity in patients with favorable PK parameters under appropriate hematological and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10071979     DOI: 10.1007/s002800050897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  10 in total

Review 1.  Dose adaptation of antineoplastic drugs in patients with liver disease.

Authors:  Lydia Tchambaz; Chantal Schlatter; Max Jakob; Anita Krähenbühl; Peter Wolf; Stephan Krähenbühl
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Severely Impaired and Dysregulated Cytochrome P450 Expression and Activities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Implications for Personalized Treatment in Patients.

Authors:  Tongmeng Yan; Linlin Lu; Cong Xie; Jiamei Chen; Xiaojuan Peng; Lijun Zhu; Ying Wang; Qiang Li; Jian Shi; Fuyuan Zhou; Ming Hu; Zhongqiu Liu
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral etoposide.

Authors:  G Toffoli; G Corona; R Sorio; I Robieux; B Basso; A M Colussi; M Boiocchi
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic considerations of oral chemotherapy in elderly patients with cancer.

Authors:  J Andrew Skirvin; Stuart M Lichtman
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Improved survival for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis treated by intra-arterial chemotherapy combining etoposide, carboplatin, epirubicin and pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy by 5-FU and enteric-coated tegafur/uracil: a pilot study.

Authors:  Toru Ishikawa; Michitaka Imai; Hiroteru Kamimura; Atsunori Tsuchiya; Tadayuki Togashi; Kouji Watanabe; Kei-ichi Seki; Hironobu Ohta; Toshiaki Yoshida; Tomoteru Kamimura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Camptothecin and podophyllotoxin derivatives: inhibitors of topoisomerase I and II - mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile.

Authors:  Jörg T Hartmann; Hans-Peter Lipp
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Oral treatment with etoposide in small cell lung cancer - dilemmas and solutions.

Authors:  Renata Rezonja; Lea Knez; Tanja Cufer; Ales Mrhar
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 9.  Pharmacological factors influencing anticancer drug selection in the elderly.

Authors:  Veena John; Sandeep Mashru; Stuart Lichtman
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.271

Review 10.  Clinical pharmacology of cancer therapies in older adults.

Authors:  A Hurria; S M Lichtman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.