Literature DB >> 10071699

Endotracheal tube narrowing after closed-system suctioning: prevalence and risk factors.

C Glass1, M J Grap, C N Sessler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few data exist about buildup of secretions within endotracheal tubes of patients treated with closed-system suctioning in the intensive care unit.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the extent, prevalence, and distribution of narrowing of endotracheal tubes related to buildup of secretions and to determine contributing factors.
METHODS: Forty endotracheal tubes were examined within 4 hours of extubation, after at least 72 hours of use. Data on patients' daily weight and fluid balance, ventilator humidification temperatures, and nurses' descriptions of secretions during the 3 days preceding extubation were recorded. Any secretion debris in the endotracheal tubes was weighed. At 1-cm intervals along the tube, the debris was described and the depth of the debris was measured to the nearest 0.5 mm.
RESULTS: Mean duration of intubation was 6.6 days. Two tubes had no debris. Mean overall depth of debris was 0.64 mm, mean greatest depth was 2.0 mm (range, 0-5 mm), and mean weight was 1.16 g. The entire tube was affected, with the greatest depth of debris at the 6- to 9-cm and 13- to 14-cm markings. Duration of intubation correlated with mean greatest depth of debris (r = 0.37, P = .02), mean overall depth of debris (r = 0.48, P = .002), and mean weight of debris (r = 0.38, P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Endotracheal tubes are markedly narrowed by the buildup of secretions after closed-system suctioning. Duration of intubation, but not endotracheal tube size or amount of secretions, was associated with the degree of narrowing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10071699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  8 in total

1.  Antibacterial-coated tracheal tubes cleaned with the Mucus Shaver : a novel method to retain long-term bactericidal activity of coated tracheal tubes.

Authors:  Lorenzo Berra; Francesco Curto; Gianluigi Li Bassi; Patrice Laquerriere; Andrea Baccarelli; Theodor Kolobow
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Comment on "antibacterial-coated tracheal tubes cleaned with a Mucus Shaver" by Berra et al.

Authors:  Peter E Spronk; Johannes H Rommes; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A comparison of the effectiveness of open and closed endotracheal suction.

Authors:  Beverley Copnell; David G Tingay; Nicholas J Kiraly; Magdy Sourial; Michael J Gordon; John F Mills; Colin J Morley; Peter A Dargaville
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Not-so-trivial pursuit: mechanical ventilation risk reduction.

Authors:  Mary Jo Grap
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony: clinical significance and implications for practice.

Authors:  Karen G Mellott; Mary Jo Grap; Cindy L Munro; Curtis N Sessler; Paul A Wetzel
Journal:  Crit Care Nurse       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 1.708

6.  Can ventilator settings reduce the negative effects of endotracheal suctioning? Investigations in a mechanical lung model.

Authors:  Espen R Nakstad; Helge Opdahl; Fridtjof Heyerdahl; Fredrik Borchsenius; Ole H Skjønsberg
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Ex Vivo Evaluation of Secretion-Clearing Device in Reducing Airway Resistance within Endotracheal Tubes.

Authors:  Christopher Waters; R Constance Wiener; Hamed M Motlagh
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2018-12-10

8.  Evaluation of a novel endotracheal tube suctioning system incorporating an inflatable sweeper.

Authors:  John D Davies; Yuh Chin Huang; Neil R MacIntyre
Journal:  Can J Respir Ther       Date:  2021-10-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.