Literature DB >> 10071143

Vapor pressure osmometry: minimum sample microvolumes.

C D Pensyl1, W J Benjamin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Vapor pressure osmometers are currently designed to handle sample volumes as small as 2.0 microliters (microl) but smaller sample volumes are desirable in tear fluid studies. We determined the minimum sample size required for adequate validity and repeatability of osmolality measurements.
METHODS: A standard saline solution (290 mmol/kg) was sampled by a variable, calibrated pipette. Forty samples were processed with a Wescor 5520 vapor pressure osmometer at each of the following volumes: 2.0, 1.6, 1.2, 1.0, 0.8, 0.7, 0.6 and 0.5 microl. Prior to each test series, the instrument was calibrated with the identical volume of 290 mmol/kg saline. Relevant descriptive statistics were computed and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the resulting data.
RESULTS: The mean osmolalities of the eight 40-sample groups ranged from 288.42 to 290.68 mmol/kg and were not significantly different from 290 mmol/ kg or each other (p>0.05). The standard deviations were inversely correlated with the sample volumes, gradually increased to approximately 1% as sample volume was reduced to 0.8 microl, then more rapidly increased as the sample volume was lowered still further.
CONCLUSION: Sample microvolumes as small as 0.8 microl can be collected for accurate and repeatable results with the Wescor 5520 vapor pressure osmometer when a standard deviation of approximately 1% is acceptable. Microvolumes from 0.7 to 0.5 microl may also be used if the expanded spread of data can be offset by multiple repeated readings. Using a 2.0 microl sample volume, the ultimate accuracy and repeatability of the Wescor vapor pressure osmometer was +/-2% at 290 mmol/kg: 99%, of all readings (+/-3 standard deviations) should fall within +/-6 mmol/kg of the true value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10071143     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1999.770106.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand        ISSN: 1395-3907


  5 in total

1.  Reproducibility and repeatability of the OcuSense TearLab™ osmometer.

Authors:  Frank Eperjesi; Maana Aujla; Hannah Bartlett
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  New approaches for diagnosis of dry eye disease.

Authors:  Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny; Ali A Khalil; Reem H El Sheikh; Mohammad A Bakr; Mohamed Gaber Eissa; Yasmine M El Sayed
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Dry eye disease: A review of diagnostic approaches and treatments.

Authors:  Hui Lin; Samuel C Yiu
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-24

4.  Osmolality of Excipients for Parenteral Formulation Measured by Freezing Point Depression and Vapor Pressure - A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Mariana Hugo Silva; Sarah P Hudson; Lidia Tajber; Matthieu Garin; Wenyu Dong; Tatsiana Khamiakova; René Holm
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  Tear Osmolarity in the Diagnosis of Systemic Dehydration and Dry Eye Disease.

Authors:  Anthony J Bron; Catherine Willshire
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.