Literature DB >> 10070918

Comparison of double-bag and Y-set disconnect systems in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a randomized prospective multicenter study.

P K Li1, C C Szeto, M C Law, K F Chau, K S Fung, C B Leung, C S Li, S F Lui, K L Tong, W K Tsang, K M Wong, K N Lai.   

Abstract

We performed a multicenter, single-blinded, prospective randomized study on the use of a double-bag disconnect system (B) versus a Y-set disconnect system (Y). The peritonitis rate, exit site infection, clinical outcome, and patients' acceptance to the procedure were assessed. A total of 120 new end-stage renal failure patients of three regional hospitals were randomized: 60 each to the B and the Y systems. The results of 60 patients on the B system and 51 on the Y system were analyzable. They were followed up for a median of 16 months. Peritonitis rates for the B and the Y systems were 33.5 and 29.4 patient-months per episode, respectively. Exit site infection rates for the B and Y systems were 17.4 and 16.0 patient-months per episode, respectively. Four catheters were removed in each group. Patients on the B system were hospitalized for 2.1 days per patient per year related to peritonitis and exit site infection, and those on the Y system were hospitalized for 1.2 days. There was no significant difference between the B and Y systems in the incidences of peritonitis (all causes and those due to coagulase-negative staphylococci), exit site infection, and in hospitalization days. However, there was a higher percentage of gram-positive infections in the Y system (52%) than in the B system (32%) and a lower percentage of gram-negative infections in the Y system (16%) than in the B system (32%). Patients on the B system had a better acceptance of the procedure than patients on the Y system, as assessed by a six-item, 10-point questionnaire (total score, 43.1 +/- 10.2 v 37.6 +/- 9.4; P < 0.005 at 1 month; 44.6 +/- 9.1 v 39.8 +/- 8.6; P < 0.01 at 6 months). From this study, it is concluded that the B and Y systems are similar in the incidences of peritonitis and exit site infection, although the B system is better accepted by patients. This is probably the first multicenter randomized study comparing the double-bag and Y-set disconnect system using only new patients who had never used other systems of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10070918     DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(99)70191-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  8 in total

Review 1.  Double bag or Y-set versus standard transfer systems for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Conal Daly; June D Cody; Izhar Khan; Kannaiyan S Rabindranath; Luke Vale; Sheila A Wallace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-08-13

2.  Impact of age on peritonitis risk in peritoneal dialysis patients: an era effect.

Authors:  Sharon J Nessim; Joanne M Bargman; Peter C Austin; Ken Story; Sarbjit V Jassal
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Predictors of peritonitis in patients on peritoneal dialysis: results of a large, prospective Canadian database.

Authors:  Sharon J Nessim; Joanne M Bargman; Peter C Austin; Rosane Nisenbaum; Sarbjit V Jassal
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Coagulase negative staphylococcal peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients: review of 232 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Cheuk-Chun Szeto; Bonnie Ching-Ha Kwan; Kai-Ming Chow; Miu-Fong Lau; Man-Ching Law; Kwok-Yi Chung; Chi-Bon Leung; Philip Kam-Tao Li
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 5.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preserving residual kidney function in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Ling Zhang; Xiaoxi Zeng; Ping Fu; Hong Mei Wu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-23

Review 6.  Change in bacterial aetiology of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis over 10 years: experience from a centre in South-East Asia.

Authors:  C-C Szeto; C-B Leung; K-M Chow; B C-H Kwan; M-C Law; A Y-M Wang; S-F Lui; P K-T Li
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 7.  Clinical causes of inflammation in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Yeoungjee Cho; Carmel M Hawley; David W Johnson
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-06

Review 8.  ISPD Peritonitis Recommendations: 2016 Update on Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Philip Kam-Tao Li; Cheuk Chun Szeto; Beth Piraino; Javier de Arteaga; Stanley Fan; Ana E Figueiredo; Douglas N Fish; Eric Goffin; Yong-Lim Kim; William Salzer; Dirk G Struijk; Isaac Teitelbaum; David W Johnson
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 1.756

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.