Literature DB >> 10070632

Assessment of physician-assisted death by members of the public prosecution in The Netherlands.

J M Cuperus-Bosma1, G van der Wal, C W Looman, P J van der Maas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify the factors that influence the assessment of reported cases of physician-assisted death by members of the public prosecution. DESIGN/
SETTING: At the beginning of 1996, during verbal interviews, 12 short case-descriptions were presented to a representative group of 47 members of the public prosecution in the Netherlands.
RESULTS: Assessment varied considerably between respondents. Some respondents made more "lenient" assessments than others. Characteristics of the respondents, such as function, personal-life philosophy and age, were not related to the assessment. Case characteristics, i.e. the presence of an explicit request, life expectancy and the type of suffering, strongly influenced the assessment. Of these characteristics, the presence or absence of an explicit request was the most important determinant of the decision whether or not to hold an inquest.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the presence of an explicit request, life expectancy and the type of suffering each influenced the assessment, each individual assessment was dependent on the assessor. The resulting danger of legal inequality and legal uncertainty, particularly in complicated cases, should be kept to a minimum by the introduction of some form of protocol and consultation in doubtful or boundary cases. The notification procedure already promotes a certain degree of uniformity in the prosecution policy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10070632      PMCID: PMC479161          DOI: 10.1136/jme.25.1.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of the notification procedure for physician-assisted death in the Netherlands.

Authors:  G van der Wal; P J van der Maas; J M Bosma; B D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; D L Willems; I Haverkate; P J Kostense
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-11-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Regression analysis for correlated data.

Authors:  K Y Liang; S L Zeger
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Euthanasia in The Netherlands.

Authors:  G van der Wal; R J Dillmann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-05-21
  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Voluntary euthanasia in The Netherlands.

Authors:  J Keown; H Jochemsen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Slippery slopes in flat countries--a response.

Authors:  J J van Delden
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Euthanasia in The Netherlands--down the slippery slope?

Authors:  R Gillon
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  The acceptability of ending a patient's life.

Authors:  M Guedj; M Gibert; A Maudet; M T Muñoz Sastre; E Mullet; P C Sorum
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  When is physician assisted suicide or euthanasia acceptable?

Authors:  S Frileux; C Lelièvre; M T Muñoz Sastre; E Mullet; P C Sorum
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.903

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.