Literature DB >> 10069191

Fluid state and blood pressure control in patients treated with long and short haemodialysis.

K S Katzarski1, B Charra, A J Luik, J Nisell, J C Divino Filho, J K Leypoldt, K M Leunissen, G Laurent, J Bergström.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients treated at the haemodialysis (HD) centre in Tassin, France have been reported to have superior survival and blood pressure (BP) control. This control has been ascribed to maintenance of an adequate fluid state, antihypertensive drugs being required in < 5% of the patients, although it could not be excluded that a high dose of HD regarding removal of uraemic toxins might also have been of value.
METHODS: The aim of the study was to assess the fluid state and BP in normotensive patients on long HD (8 h) in Tassin (group TN) using bioimpedance to measure extracellular volume (ECV), ultrasound for determining the inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD), and 'on-line' monitoring of the change in blood volume (BV), and to compare them with normotensive (group SN) and hypertensive (group SH) patients on short HD (3-5 h) at centres in Sweden. ECV was normalized (ECVn) by arbitrarily setting the median ECV (in % of body weight) in SN patients at 100% for each gender, recalculating the individual values and combining the results for male and female patients in each group.
RESULTS: The dose of HD (Kt/V urea) was higher for TN patients than for Swedish patients who had a similar Kt/V, whether hypertensive or not. SH patients had significantly higher ECVn and IVCD than TN and SN patients. TN and SN patients did not differ significantly regarding ECVn and IVCD before and after HD. However, in a subgroup of eight TN patients, ECVn was below the range of that in SH and SN patients, due to obesity with a high body mass index. Another subgroup of 14 TN patients had a higher ECVn than most of the SN patients and also higher than the median ECVn in the SH group, without any difference in body mass index, but they were nevertheless normotensive. The fall in BV was greater in SN than in TN patients, presumably due to a higher ultrafiltration rate in SN patients. However, SH patients had a smaller change in BV than SN patients, presumably because their state of overhydration facilitated refilling of BV from the interstitial fluid.
CONCLUSIONS: Normotension can be achieved independently of the duration and dose (Kt/V urea) of HD, if the control of post-dialysis ECV is adequate. However, this is more difficult to achieve with short than with more prolonged HD during which the ultrafiltration rate is lower, BV changes are smaller and intradialysis symptoms less frequent. The results in the subgroup of patients with high ECVn at Tassin suggest that normotension may also be achieved in patients with fluid overload provided that the dialysis time is long enough to ensure more efficient removal of one or more vasoactive factors that cause or contribute to hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10069191     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/14.2.369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  25 in total

1.  Volume control in diabetic and nondiabetic peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Hong-bing Gan; Meng-hua Chen; Bengt Lindholm; Tao Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Body Fluids in End-Stage Renal Disease: Statics and Dynamics.

Authors:  Jeroen P Kooman; Frank M van der Sande
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  Cardiac, Inflammatory and Metabolic Parameters: Hemodialysis versus Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Silvia Lai; Alessio Molfino; Gaspare Elios Russo; Massimo Testorio; Alessandro Galani; Georgie Innico; Nicla Frassetti; Valentina Pistolesi; Santo Morabito; Filippo Rossi Fanelli
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 4.  Evaluation and Treatment of Hypertension in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Peter Noel Van Buren
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Extracellular fluid management and hypertension in urban dwelling versus rural dwelling hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Marcello Tonelli; Anita Lloyd; Neesh Pannu; Scott Klarenbach; Pietro Ravani; Kailash Jindal; Jennifer MacRae; Larry Unsworth; Braden Manns; Brenda Hemmelgarn
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 6.  Does kidney disease cause hypertension?

Authors:  Aldo J Peixoto; Marcelo Orias; Gary V Desir
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 7.  The advantages and challenges of increasing the duration and frequency of maintenance dialysis sessions.

Authors:  Charles Chazot; Guillaume Jean
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Nephrol       Date:  2008-11-25

8.  Equivalent Fall Risk in Elderly Patients on Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Janine Farragher; Tasleem Rajan; Ernest Chiu; Ozkan Ulutas; George Tomlinson; Wendy L Cook; Sarbjit V Jassal
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Dry-weight reduction in hypertensive hemodialysis patients (DRIP): a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajiv Agarwal; Pooneh Alborzi; Sangeetha Satyan; Robert P Light
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Daily ultrafiltration results in improved blood pressure control and more efficient removal of small molecules during hemodialysis.

Authors:  James P Jones; Edward F Leonard; Gagangeet Sandhu; Gary Winkel; Nathan W Levin; Stanley Cortell
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.