Literature DB >> 10069151

Methodological challenges for measuring quality of care at the end of life.

F J Fowler1, K M Coppola, J M Teno.   

Abstract

Measurement is a fundamental step in improving the quality of care for dying patients and their families. Yet, there are important methodological challenges to be addressed. In conducting surveys about the patient and family experience, research is needed regarding the relative merits and cost-effectiveness of prospective or retrospective surveys after the patient's death. Proxies are an important source of information given that the majority of patients can not be interviewed in the last week of life. Research is needed to understand who is best able to serve as a proxy and the validity of their reports. The cost-effectiveness and comparability of alternative data collection strategies need to be examined. These and other important issues need to be addressed in designing reliable, valid, and clinically manageable measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10069151     DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(98)00133-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  17 in total

1.  Measuring quality of care at the end of life: who? when? where? and how?

Authors:  R W Meyer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-06

2.  Appropriate time frames for data collection in quality of life research among cancer patients at the end of life.

Authors:  Siew Tzuh Tang; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): empirical domains and theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  Lois Downey; J Randall Curtis; William E Lafferty; Jerald R Herting; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Does hospice improve quality of care for persons dying from dementia?

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Pedro L Gozalo; Ian C Lee; Sylvia Kuo; Carol Spence; Stephen R Connor; David J Casarett
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Late-stage HIV/AIDS patients' and their familial caregivers' agreement on the palliative care outcome scale.

Authors:  Rachel Krug; Daniel Karus; Peter A Selwyn; Victoria H Raveis
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Predictors of the extent of agreement for quality of life assessments between terminally ill cancer patients and their primary family caregivers in Taiwan.

Authors:  Siew Tzuh Tang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Toward population-based indicators of quality end-of-life care: testing stakeholder agreement.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; Robin Urquhart; Eric Mykhalovskiy; Amy Folkes; Grace Johnston; Frederick I Burge; Craig C Earle; Susan Dent
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Shared priorities for the end-of-life period.

Authors:  Lois Downey; Ruth A Engelberg; J Randall Curtis; William E Lafferty; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Validation of the Chinese version of the Care Evaluation Scale for measuring the quality of structure and process of end-of-life care from the perspective of bereaved family.

Authors:  Juanjuan Zhao; Liming You; Hongmei Tao; Frances Kam Yuet Wong
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Does the 'Liverpool Care Pathway' facilitate an improvement in quality of care for dying cancer patients?

Authors:  C R Mayland; E M I Williams; J Addington-Hall; T F Cox; J E Ellershaw
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.