Literature DB >> 10068919

"INTERMED": a method to assess health service needs. I. Development and reliability.

F J Huyse1, J S Lyons, F C Stiefel, J P Slaets, P de Jonge, P Fink, R O Gans, P Guex, T Herzog, A Lobo, G C Smith, R S van Schijndel.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and to test the reliability of a new method called INTERMED, for health service needs assessment. The INTERMED integrates the biopsychosocial aspects of disease and the relationship between patient and health care system in a comprehensive scheme and reflects an operationalized conceptual approach to case mix or case complexity. The method is developed to enhance interdisciplinary communication between (para-) medical specialists and to provide a method to describe case complexity for clinical, scientific, and educational purposes. First, a feasibility study (N = 21 patients) was conducted which included double scoring and discussion of the results. This led to a version of the instrument on which two interrater reliability studies were performed. In study 1, the INTERMED was double scored for 14 patients admitted to an internal ward by a psychiatrist and an internist on the basis of a joint interview conducted by both. In study 2, on the basis of medical charts, two clinicians separately double scored the INTERMED in 16 patients referred to the outpatient psychiatric consultation service. Averaged over both studies, in 94.2% of all ratings there was no important difference between the raters (more than 1 point difference). As a research interview, it takes about 20 minutes; as part of the whole process of history taking it takes about 15 minutes. In both studies, improvements were suggested by the results. Analyses of study 1 revealed that on most items there was considerable agreement; some items were improved. Also, the reference point for the prognoses was changed so that it reflected both short- and long-term prognoses. Analyses of study 2 showed that in this setting, less agreement between the raters was obtained due to the fact that the raters were less experienced and the scoring procedure was more susceptible to differences. Some improvements--mainly of the anchor points--were specified which may further enhance interrater reliability. The INTERMED proves to be a reliable method for classifying patients' care needs, especially when used by experienced raters scoring by patient interview. It can be a useful tool in assessing patients' care needs, as well as the level of needed adjustment between general and mental health service delivery. The INTERMED is easily applicable in the clinical setting at low time-costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10068919     DOI: 10.1016/s0163-8343(98)00057-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0163-8343            Impact factor:   3.238


  39 in total

1.  From consultation to integrated health risk assessment.

Authors:  Frits J Huyse
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Subclassification of low back pain: a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Evdokia V Billis; Christopher J McCarthy; Jacqueline A Oldham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The INTERMED: a screening instrument to identify multiple sclerosis patients in need of multidisciplinary treatment.

Authors:  E L J Hoogervorst; P de Jonge; B Jelles; F J Huyse; I Heeres; H M van der Ploeg; B M J Uitdehaag; C H Polman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Patient care complexity as perceived by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Jill K Mount; R Michael Massanari; Jay Teachman
Journal:  Fam Syst Health       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 5.  Identification of prognostic factors for chronicity in patients with low back pain: a review of screening instruments.

Authors:  M Melloh; A Elfering; C Egli Presland; C Roeder; T Barz; C Rolli Salathé; O Tamcan; U Mueller; J C Theis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Screening tools to identify patients with complex health needs at risk of high use of health care services: A scoping review.

Authors:  Valérie Marcoux; Maud-Christine Chouinard; Fatoumata Diadiou; Isabelle Dufour; Catherine Hudon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Reliability of INTERMED Spanish version and applicability in liver transplant patients: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Elena Lobo; M José Rabanaque; M Luisa Bellido; Antonio Lobo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  BMI Course Over 10 Years After Bariatric Surgery and Biopsychosocial Complexity Assessed with the INTERMED: a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yann Corminboeuf; Beate Wild; Catherine Zdrojewski; Dieter Schellberg; Lucie Favre; Michel Suter; Friedrich Stiefel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Biopsychosocial health care needs at the emergency room: challenge of complexity.

Authors:  Franziska Matzer; Ursula V Wisiak; Monika Graninger; Wolfgang Söllner; Hans Peter Stilling; Monika Glawischnig-Goschnik; Andreas Lueger; Christian Fazekas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Intoxicated persons showing challenging behavior demand complexity interventions: a pilot study at the interface of the ER and the complexity intervention unit.

Authors:  Stefan M H Verheesen; Freek Ten Doesschate; Maarten A van Schijndel; Rutger Jan van der Gaag; Wiepke Cahn; Jeroen A van Waarde
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 5.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.