Literature DB >> 10068082

S-phase fraction combined with other patient and tumor characteristics for the prognosis of node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.

J Bryant1, B Fisher, N Gündüz, J P Costantino, B Emir.   

Abstract

Women with estrogen-receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer and no axillary lymph-node involvement are considered to have excellent overall prognosis. However, this population is not homogeneous with regard to risk of recurrence; in fact, some of these patients have a prognosis no better than that of many women with ER-negative tumors or positive axillary nodes. Consequently, better tumor markers and better use of those currently available are needed to distinguish patients who would benefit from more aggressive therapy from those for whom such therapy is unnecessary. A well-defined cohort of over 4000 breast cancer patients from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol B-14 who had ER-positive tumors and no axillary lymph-node involvement was analyzed to ascertain the usefulness of tumor cell S-phase fraction for prognosis. The significance of clinical tumor size, patient age at surgery, ER and progesterone receptor (PgR) expression, and nuclear grade was also explored. Statistical methods based on smoothing splines were used to relate treatment failure and mortality rates to patient and tumor characteristics. Models for 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were developed and summarized. The attenuation of the prognostic importance of covariates over time was investigated. After other characteristics were accounted for, a strong association was found between S-phase fraction and DFS, as well as survival. Tumor size, patient age at surgery, and PgR status were also significantly associated with outcome. The diversity of risk in the B-14 population was more extreme than is generally recognized. The prognostic capabilities of S-phase, tumor size, and PgR status were sharply attenuated as the time from surgery increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10068082     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006184428857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  17 in total

Review 1.  Utilizing prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Deepa S Subramaniam; Claudine Isaacs
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-03

Review 2.  Prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer: a review of studies with sample size more than 200 and follow-up more than 5 years.

Authors:  Attiqa N Mirza; Nadeem Q Mirza; Georges Vlastos; S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Estrogen receptor (ESR1) mRNA expression and benefit from tamoxifen in the treatment and prevention of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Chungyeul Kim; Gong Tang; Katherine L Pogue-Geile; Joseph P Costantino; Frederick L Baehner; Joffre Baker; Maureen T Cronin; Drew Watson; Steven Shak; Olga L Bohn; Debora Fumagalli; Yusuke Taniyama; Ahwon Lee; Megan L Reilly; Victor G Vogel; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; Charles E Geyer; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark; Soonmyung Paik
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Time-Varying Effects of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi; Hanna Bandos; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; William F Anderson; Edward H Romond; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  A Multiresolution Hazard Model for Multicenter Survival Studies: Application to Tamoxifen Treatment in Early Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Peter Bouman; Xiao-Li Meng; James Dignam; Vanja Dukić
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Modeling the effect of tumor size in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Claire Verschraegen; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Gábor Cserni; Richard Gordon; Melanie E Royce; Georges Vlastos; Patricia Tai; Guy Storme
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Bayesian Hierarchical Multiresolution Hazard Model for the Study of Time-Dependent Failure Patterns in Early Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Vanja Dukić; James Dignam
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.728

Review 8.  NSABP breast cancer clinical trials: recent results and future directions.

Authors:  Eleftherios P Mamounas
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2003-10

Review 9.  Biomolecular features of clinical relevance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Daidone; Angelo Paradiso; Massimo Gion; Nadia Harbeck; Fred Sweep; Manfred Schmitt
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-17       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Chemosensitivity and stratification by a five monoclonal antibody immunohistochemistry test in the NSABP B14 and B20 trials.

Authors:  Douglas T Ross; Chung-Yeul Kim; Gong Tang; Olga L Bohn; Rodney A Beck; Brian Z Ring; Robert S Seitz; Soonmyung Paik; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.