Literature DB >> 10048306

Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.

M R Endsley1, D B Kaber.   

Abstract

Various levels of automation (LOA) designating the degree of human operator and computer control were explored within the context of a dynamic control task as a means of improving overall human/machine performance. Automated systems have traditionally been explored as binary function allocations; either the human or the machine is assigned to a given task. More recently, intermediary levels of automation have been discussed as a means of maintaining operator involvement in system performance, leading to improvements in situation awareness and reductions in out-of-the-loop performance problems. A LOA taxonomy applicable to a wide range of psychomotor and cognitive tasks is presented here. The taxonomy comprises various schemes of generic control system function allocations. The functions allocated to a human operator and/or computer included monitoring displays, generating processing options, selecting an 'optimal' option and implementing that option. The impact of the LOA taxonomy was assessed within a dynamic and complex cognitive control task by measuring its effect on human/system performance, situation awareness and workload. Thirty subjects performed simulation trials involving various levels of automation. Several automation failures occurred and out-of-the-loop performance decrements were assessed. Results suggest that, in terms of performance, human operators benefit most from automation of the implementation portion of the task, but only under normal operating conditions; in contrast, removal of the operator from task implementation is detrimental to performance recovery if the automated system fails. Joint human/system option generation significantly degraded performance in comparison to human or automated option generation alone. Lower operator workload and higher situation awareness were observed under automation of the decision making portion of the task (i.e. selection of options), although human/system performance was only slightly improved. The implications of these findings for the design of automated systems are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10048306     DOI: 10.1080/001401399185595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  16 in total

1.  Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach.

Authors:  Mary L Cummings
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  [Update on computer- and mechatronic-assisted head and neck surgery in Germany].

Authors:  K Bumm; P A Federspil; T Klenzner; O Majdani; J Raczkowsky; G Strauss; J Schipper
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction.

Authors:  Jenay M Beer; Arthur D Fisk; Wendy A Rogers
Journal:  J Hum Robot Interact       Date:  2014-07

4.  The Effect of Information Analysis Automation Display Content on Human Judgment Performance in Noisy Environments.

Authors:  Ellen J Bass; Leigh A Baumgart; Kathryn Klein Shepley
Journal:  J Cogn Eng Decis Mak       Date:  2013-03-01

5.  Understanding human management of automation errors.

Authors:  Sara E McBride; Wendy A Rogers; Arthur D Fisk
Journal:  Theor Issues Ergon Sci       Date:  2014

6.  Understanding pharmacist decision making for adverse drug event (ADE) detection.

Authors:  Shobha Phansalkar; Jennifer M Hoffman; John F Hurdle; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 7.  Human-Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature.

Authors:  Thomas O'Neill; Nathan McNeese; Amy Barron; Beau Schelble
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  An assigned responsibility system for robotic teleoperation control.

Authors:  Nicolas Small; Kevin Lee; Graham Mann
Journal:  Int J Intell Robot Appl       Date:  2018-01-19

9.  Old habits die hard: a case study on how new ways of teaching colonoscopy affect the habitus of experienced clinicians.

Authors:  Ole Lund; Berit Andersen; Mette K Christensen
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2016-09-19

10.  Man vs machine in emergency medicine - a study on the effects of manual and automatic vital sign documentation on data quality and perceived workload, using observational paired sample data and questionnaires.

Authors:  Niclas Skyttberg; Rong Chen; Sabine Koch
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2018-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.