Literature DB >> 10048036

Selective advantages created by codon ambiguity allowed for the evolution of an alternative genetic code in Candida spp.

M A Santos1, C Cheesman, V Costa, P Moradas-Ferreira, M F Tuite.   

Abstract

Several species of the genus Candida decode the standard leucine CUG codon as serine. This and other deviations from the standard genetic code in both nuclear and mitochondrial genomes invalidate the notion that the genetic code is frozen and universal and prompt the questions 'why alternative genetic codes evolved and, more importantly, how can an organism survive a genetic code change?' To address these two questions, we have attempted to reconstruct the early stages of Candida albicans CUG reassignment in the closely related yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These studies suggest that this genetic code change was driven by selection using a molecular mechanism that requires CUG ambiguity. Such codon ambiguity induced a significant decrease in fitness, indicating that CUG reassignment can only be selected if it introduces an evolutionary edge to counteract the negative impact of ambiguity. We have shown that CUG ambiguity induces the expression of a novel set of stress proteins and triggers the general stress response, which, in turn, creates a competitive edge under stress conditions. In addition, CUG ambiguity in S. cerevisiae induces the expression of a number of novel phenotypes that mimic the natural resistance to stress characteristic of C. albicans. The identification of an evolutionary advantage created by CUG ambiguity is the first experimental evidence for a genetic code change driven by selection and suggests a novel role for codon reassignment in the adaptation to new ecological niches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10048036     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01233.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  49 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of microbial pathogens.

Authors:  J Morschhäuser; G Köhler; W Ziebuhr; G Blum-Oehler; U Dobrindt; J Hacker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Diversity in genetic in vivo methods for protein-protein interaction studies: from the yeast two-hybrid system to the mammalian split-luciferase system.

Authors:  Bram Stynen; Hélène Tournu; Jan Tavernier; Patrick Van Dijck
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 3.  Cellular mechanisms that control mistranslation.

Authors:  Noah M Reynolds; Beth A Lazazzera; Michael Ibba
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Mitochondrial genetic codes evolve to match amino acid requirements of proteins.

Authors:  Jonathan Swire; Olivia P Judson; Austin Burt
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Mistakes in translation don't translate into termination.

Authors:  Randall A Hughes; Andrew D Ellington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Inhibited cell growth and protein functional changes from an editing-defective tRNA synthetase.

Authors:  Jamie M Bacher; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard; Paul R Schimmel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  An asymmetric underlying rule in the assignment of codons: possible clue to a quick early evolution of the genetic code via successive binary choices.

Authors:  Marc Delarue
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 4.942

8.  Certain non-standard coding tables appear to be more robust to error than the standard genetic code.

Authors:  Mehmet Levent Kurnaz; Tugce Bilgin; Isil Aksan Kurnaz
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Codon misreading tRNAs promote tumor growth in mice.

Authors:  Mafalda Santos; Patricia M Pereira; A Sofia Varanda; Joana Carvalho; Mafalda Azevedo; Denisa D Mateus; Nuno Mendes; Patricia Oliveira; Fábio Trindade; Marta Teixeira Pinto; Renata Bordeira-Carriço; Fátima Carneiro; Rui Vitorino; Carla Oliveira; Manuel A S Santos
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.652

10.  Molecular reconstruction of a fungal genetic code alteration.

Authors:  Denisa D Mateus; João A Paredes; Yaiza Español; Lluís Ribas de Pouplana; Gabriela R Moura; Manuel A S Santos
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 4.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.