Literature DB >> 10047630

Calcified plaque cross-sectional area in human arteries: correlation between intravascular ultrasound and undecalcified histology.

H Kostamaa1, J Donovan, S Kasaoka, J Tobis, L Fitzpatrick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this investigation was to quantify the amount of intralesional calcium detected by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) compared with undecalcified histology in human arteries. This method preserves intralesional calcium and reduces sectioning artifacts, thereby providing an accurate measure of calcium plaque morphology. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Ten arterial segments (5 coronary, 5 iliac) were obtained at autopsy. IVUS imaging was performed with a 4.9F catheter at an automated pullback rate of 1.0 mm/s. The undecalcified arteries were dehydrated in ascending alcohol and polymerized in glycol methylmethacrylate. The arteries were cut into 200-microm sections with an Isomet low-speed saw and stained with Goldner's trichrome. The lumen cross-sectional area, the calcium plaque cross-sectional area, the calcium plaque depth, length, and angle of arc of calcified plaque were measured from the IVUS images and histologic sections. In 24 selected cross sections, there were 38 separate calcium plaques. An independent observer correctly identified 34 of 38 calcified plaques for a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 97%. The total mean calcified plaque cross-sectional area measured from histology was 4.6 +/- 4.1 mm2 compared with 2.8 +/- 2.3 mm2 by IVUS (P =.002). Plaque depth measured by histology was 1.2 +/- 0.4 mm versus 0.7 +/- 0.2 mm by IVUS (P =.001). The length of calcium plaques measured by histology was 3.6 +/- 1.78 mm versus 3.6 +/- 1.5 mm for IVUS (r = 0.79).
CONCLUSIONS: IVUS accurately depicts circumferential calcified lesions with high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (97%). However, IVUS underestimates the total calcified plaque cross-sectional area by 39%. This is mainly because of the inability of the ultrasound to penetrate intralesional calcium, which leads to an underestimation of the depth of calcium by 45%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10047630     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70496-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  9 in total

1.  Novel preclinical method for evaluating the efficacy of a percutaneous treatment in human ex vivo calcified plaque.

Authors:  Robert S Chisena; Jordan Sengenberger; Albert J Shih; Hitinder Gurm
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Intravascular ultrasound: principles and cerebrovascular applications.

Authors:  H Zacharatos; A E Hassan; A I Qureshi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Neointimal hyperplasia associated with synthetic hemodialysis grafts.

Authors:  Li Li; Christi M Terry; Yan-Ting E Shiu; Alfred K Cheung
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  High-resolution MR study of the relationship between superficial calcification and the stability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque.

Authors:  Xian Xu; Haiyue Ju; Jianming Cai; Youquan Cai; Xinjiang Wang; Qingjun Wang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Small coronary calcifications are not detectable by 64-slice contrast enhanced computed tomography.

Authors:  Alina G van der Giessen; Frank J H Gijsen; Jolanda J Wentzel; Pushpa M Jairam; Theo van Walsum; Lisan A E Neefjes; Nico R Mollet; Wiro J Niessen; Frans N van de Vosse; Pim J de Feyter; Antonius F W van der Steen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  The invasive assessment of coronary atherosclerosis and stents using optical coherence tomography: a clinical update.

Authors:  Muhammad Asrar Ul Haq; Jamie Layland; Vivek Mutha; Peter Barlis
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2013-07-26

Review 7.  Mouse models of atherosclerosis: a historical perspective and recent advances.

Authors:  Yee Ting Lee; Hiu Yu Lin; Yin Wah Fiona Chan; Ka Hou Christien Li; Olivia Tsz Ling To; Bryan P Yan; Tong Liu; Guangping Li; Wing Tak Wong; Wendy Keung; Gary Tse
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 8.  Intravascular imaging in coronary stent restenosis: Prevention, characterization, and management.

Authors:  Amr Abouelnour; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-09

Review 9.  The Value of Intracoronary Imaging and Coronary Physiology When Treating Calcified Lesions.

Authors:  Yasushi Ueki; Tatsuhiko Otsuka; Kiyoshi Hibi; Lorenz Räber
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.