Literature DB >> 10037545

What clinical information resources are available in family physicians' offices?

J W Ely1, B T Levy, A Hartz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When faced with questions about patient care, family physicians usually turn to books in their personal libraries for the answers. The resources in these libraries have not been adequately characterized.
METHODS: We recorded the titles of all medical books in the personal libraries of 103 randomly selected family physicians in eastern Iowa. We also noted all clinical information that was posted on walls, bulletin boards, refrigerators, and so forth. Participants were asked to describe their use of other resources such as computers, MEDLINE, reprint files, and "peripheral brains" (personal notebooks of clinical information). For each physician, we recorded how often the resources were used to answer clinical questions during 2 half-day observation periods.
RESULTS: The 103 participants owned a total of 5794 medical books, with 2836 different titles. Each physician kept an average of 56 books in the office. Prescribing references (especially the Physicians' Desk Reference) were most common (owned by 100% of the participants), followed by books on general internal medicine (99%), adult infectious disease (89%), and general pediatrics (83%). Books used to answer clinical questions were more likely to be up to date (copyright date within 5 years) than unused books (74% vs 27%, P <.001). Items posted on walls included drug dosage charts and pediatric immunization schedules. Only 26% of the physicians had computers in their offices.
CONCLUSIONS: Drug-prescribing textbooks were the most common type of book in family physicians' offices, followed by books on general internal medicine and adult infectious diseases. Although many books were relatively old, those used to answer clinical questions were generally current.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10037545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  11 in total

1.  Are we providing doctors with the training and tools for lifelong learning?. Interview by Abi Berger.

Authors:  A F Shaughnessy; D C Slawson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-13

2.  SmartQuery: context-sensitive links to medical knowledge sources from the electronic patient record.

Authors:  Susan L Price; William R Hersh; Daniel D Olson; Peter J Embi
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

3.  Medical faculty's use of print and electronic journals: changes over time and in comparison with scientists.

Authors:  Carol Tenopir; Donald W King; Amy Bush
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-04

4.  Are we providing doctors with the training and tools for lifelong learning?

Authors:  A F Shaughnessy; D Slawson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-11

5.  New Mexico practitioners' access to and satisfaction with online clinical information resources: an interview study using qualitative data analysis software.

Authors:  Patricia V Bradley; Christina M Getrich; Gale G Hannigan
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2015-01

6.  PrimeAnswers: A practical interface for answering primary care questions.

Authors:  Debra S Ketchell; Leilani St Anna; David Kauff; Barak Gaster; Diane Timberlake
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Information-seeking behaviors of practitioners in a primary care practice-based research network (PBRN).

Authors:  James E Andrews; Kevin A Pearce; Carol Ireson; Margaret M Love
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2005-04

8.  Patient-care questions that physicians are unable to answer.

Authors:  John W Ely; Jerome A Osheroff; Saverio M Maviglia; Marcy E Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Use of information technology in general practice.

Authors:  Jason J Smith; Rebecca J Mallard-Smith; Victoria Beattie; David K Beattie
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  Development of two shortened systematic review formats for clinicians.

Authors:  Laure Perrier; Nav Persaud; Anita Ko; Monika Kastner; Jeremy Grimshaw; K Ann McKibbon; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.