Literature DB >> 19020882

The role of lymph node density in bladder cancer prognostication.

Marcus L Quek1, Robert C Flanigan.   

Abstract

Pelvic lymph node metastases from bladder cancer occur in about 25% of patients undergoing radical cystectomy. While the majority of patients with lymph node metastases will develop progressive disease, some patients do exhibit long-term survival with and without adjuvant chemotherapy. The concept of lymph node density has been proposed as a means to stratify patient prognosis since it takes into account two important factors-the number of positive nodes (tumor burden) and the total number of nodes removed/examined (extent of dissection). Due to the lack of agreement on the extent of lymphadenectomy, lymph node density facilitates standardization of lymph node staging, thus allowing for adjuvant therapies and clinical trials to be more uniformly applied. Whether lymph node density provides improved prognostication over the standard nodal staging or absolute number of positive lymph nodes remains controversial. We review the literature regarding the role of lymph node density in the prognostic stratification of node-positive bladder cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19020882     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-008-0347-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  35 in total

1.  Outcome of patients with grossly node positive bladder cancer after pelvic lymph node dissection and radical cystectomy.

Authors:  H W Herr; S M Donat
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Superiority of ratio based lymph node staging for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Harry W Herr
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Surgical benchmarks for the treatment of invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Eila C Skinner; John P Stein; Donald G Skinner
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Lymph node density: surrogate marker for quality of resection in bladder cancer?

Authors:  Ashish M Kamat; Mark B Fisher
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.512

5.  Separating surgical quality from causality--gaining perspective in the debate on lymph node count and extent of lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Scott M Gilbert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  The importance of an extended lymphadenectomy in the management of high-grade invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Marcus L Quek; Kristin M Sanderson; Siamak Daneshmand; John P Stein
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.512

7.  The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan L Wright; Daniel W Lin; Michael P Porter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.

Authors:  Kenneth Steven; Asger L Poulsen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Risk factors for patients with pelvic lymph node metastases following radical cystectomy with en bloc pelvic lymphadenectomy: concept of lymph node density.

Authors:  John P Stein; Jie Cai; Susan Groshen; Donald G Skinner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Pelvic lymph node dissection can be curative in patients with node positive bladder cancer.

Authors:  J Vieweg; J E Gschwend; H W Herr; W R Fair
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The role and extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the management of patients with invasive urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Seth P Lerner
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-06-30

Review 2.  [Lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer: current status and controversies].

Authors:  T Metzger; G N Thalmann; P Zehnder
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Differences in histopathological evaluation of standard lymph node dissections result in differences in nodal count but not in survival.

Authors:  L S Mertens; R P Meijer; E van Werkhoven; A Bex; H G van der Poel; B W van Rhijn; W Meinhardt; S Horenblas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Development and external validation of nomograms predicting disease-free and cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Simone; Marco Bianchi; Diana Giannarelli; Siamak Daneshmand; Rocco Papalia; Mariaconsiglia Ferriero; Salvatore Guaglianone; Steno Sentinelli; Renzo Colombo; Francesco Montorsi; Devis Collura; Giovanni Muto; Giacomo Novara; Rodolfo Hurle; Michael Rink; Margit Fisch; Hassan Abol-Enein; Gus Miranda; Mihir Desai; Inderbir Gill; Michele Gallucci
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Seeking a standard for adequate pathologic lymph node staging in primary bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Kumaran Mudaliar; Vikas Mehta; Güliz A Barkan; Marcus L Quek; Robert C Flanigan; Maria M Picken
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Pelvic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: literature review.

Authors:  Ehab A Elzayat; Ali A Al-Zahrani
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-08-29

7.  Lymph node density in muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder; De novo versus progressive disease.

Authors:  Ahmed Elabbady; Mohamed Mohieeldin Hashad; Ahmed Fouad Kotb; Dina Mohamed Abdullah; Ahmad Beltagy
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.