Literature DB >> 10030703

Detection of campylobacter in gastroenteritis: comparison of direct PCR assay of faecal samples with selective culture.

A J Lawson1, M S Shafi, K Pathak, J Stanley.   

Abstract

The prevalence of campylobacter gastroenteritis has been estimated by bacterial isolation using selective culture. However, there is evidence that certain species and strains are not recovered on selective agars. We have therefore compared direct PCR assays of faecal samples with campylobacter culture, and explored the potential of PCR for simultaneous detection and identification to the species level. Two hundred unselected faecal samples from cases of acute gastroenteritis were cultured on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar and subjected to DNA extraction and PCR assay. Culture on CCDA indicated that 16 of the 200 samples contained 'Campylobacter spp.'. By contrast, PCR assays detected campylobacters in 19 of the 200 samples, including 15 of the culture-positive samples, and further identified them as: C. jejuni (16), C. coli (2) and C. hyointestinalis (1). These results show that PCR offers a different perspective on the incidence and identity of campylobacters in human gastroenteritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10030703      PMCID: PMC2809561          DOI: 10.1017/s0950268898001630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   2.451


  19 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Alexon-trend ProSpecT Campylobacter microplate assay.

Authors:  R Tolcin; M M LaSalvia; B A Kirkley; E A Vetter; F R Cockerill; G W Procop
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Site-specific clinical evaluation of the Luminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogen panel for detection of infectious gastroenteritis in fecal specimens.

Authors:  Anami Patel; Jose Navidad; Sanjib Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Effects of subtherapeutic administration of antimicrobial agents to beef cattle on the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter hyointestinalis.

Authors:  G D Inglis; T A McAllister; H W Busz; L J Yanke; D W Morck; M E Olson; R R Read
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Pet dogs and chicken meat as reservoirs of Campylobacter spp. in Barbados.

Authors:  Suzanne N Workman; George E Mathison; Marc C Lavoie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Rapid identification of Campylobacter spp. by melting peak analysis of biprobes in real-time PCR.

Authors:  J M Logan; K J Edwards; N A Saunders; J Stanley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Large-scale survey of Campylobacter species in human gastroenteritis by PCR and PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  A J Lawson; J M Logan; G L O'neill; M Desai; J Stanley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Isolation, identification and differentiation of Campylobacter spp. using multiplex PCR assay from goats in Khartoum State, Sudan.

Authors:  Atif Elbrissi; Y A Sabeil; Khalda A Khalifa; Khalid Enan; Osama M Khair; A M El Hussein
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 8.  Diagnosis and treatment of bacterial diarrhea.

Authors:  James V Lawler; Mark R Wallace
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-08

9.  Use of PCR for direct detection of Campylobacter species in bovine feces.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; Lisa D Kalischuk
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Detection of campylobacter species: a comparison of culture and polymerase chain reaction based methods.

Authors:  S P Kulkarni; S Lever; J M J Logan; A J Lawson; J Stanley; M S Shafi
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.