Literature DB >> 10030012

Campylobacter infections in fattening pigs; excretion pattern and genetic diversity.

M J Weijtens1, R D Reinders, H A Urlings, J Van der Plas.   

Abstract

The excretion of campylobacter by eight individually housed fattening pigs was monitored during 15 weeks. Rectal faeces samples were collected six times from these pigs and twice from their mothers (seven sows). Campylobacter was cultured from these samples on Preston medium. In some pigs, samples positive for campylobacter alternated with negative samples. Campylobacter was detected in at least four of the six samples collected per fattening pig. The average campylobacter count per sampling showed a decreasing trend (P < 0.001). Of the seven sows, six were shown to excrete campylobacter. Campylobacter isolates of pigs and sows were typed using the Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus Polymerase Chain Reaction (ERIC-PCR); 28 different campylobacter types were distinguished. Up to five different types were isolated from single faeces samples. Individual porkers could harbour up to eight types during their fattening period. The three types most frequently isolated from the fattening pigs were also present in the sows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10030012     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00636.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of genotyping large numbers of Escherichia coli isolates by enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-PCR.

Authors:  Kiersten J Meacham; Lixin Zhang; Betsy Foxman; Richard J Bauer; Carl F Marrs
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Arcobacter population dynamics in pigs on farrow-to-finish farms.

Authors:  Sarah De Smet; Lieven De Zutter; Lies Debruyne; Frédéric Vangroenweghe; Peter Vandamme; Kurt Houf
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Discrimination of enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus PCR types of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  D J M Mouwen; M J B M Weijtens; R Capita; C Alonso-Calleja; M Prieto
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Campylobacter coli in swine production: antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and molecular epidemiology.

Authors:  Siddhartha Thakur; Wondwossen A Gebreyes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Molecular epidemiologic investigation of Campylobacter coli in swine production systems, using multilocus sequence typing.

Authors:  Siddhartha Thakur; W E Morgan Morrow; Julie A Funk; Peter B Bahnson; Wondwossen A Gebreyes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Differences in the fecal concentrations and genetic diversities of Campylobacter jejuni populations among individual cows in two dairy herds.

Authors:  Delphine Rapp; Colleen M Ross; Eve J Pleydell; Richard W Muirhead
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  (CGG)4-based PCR as a novel tool for discrimination of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains: comparison with enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-PCR.

Authors:  Wioletta Adamus-Bialek; Arkadiusz Wojtasik; Marta Majchrzak; Marek Sosnowski; Pawel Parniewski
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Pathogen survival trajectories: an eco-environmental approach to the modeling of human campylobacteriosis ecology.

Authors:  Chris Skelly; Phil Weinstein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Farm level survey of spore-forming bacteria on four dairy farms in the Waikato region of New Zealand.

Authors:  Tanushree B Gupta; Gale Brightwell
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  Prevalence and risk factors for bacterial food-borne zoonotic hazards in slaughter pigs: a review.

Authors:  J Fosse; H Seegers; C Magras
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 2.702

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.