Literature DB >> 10029613

Safety and efficacy of dynamic muscle plasty for anal incontinence: lessons from a prospective, multicenter trial.

R D Madoff1, H R Rosen, C G Baeten, L J LaFontaine, E Cavina, M Devesa, P Rouanet, J Christiansen, J L Faucheron, W Isbister, L Köhler, P J Guelinckx, L Påhlman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dynamic muscle plasty has been advocated as therapy for refractory fecal incontinence and for anorectal reconstruction to avoid colostomy after abdominoperineal resection. This study evaluates the results of a multicenter experience with dynamic muscle plasty in the treatment of fecal incontinence and total anal reconstruction.
METHODS: One hundred thirty-nine patients were enrolled at 12 centers between June 1992 and November 1994 and followed up through June 1996. Intramuscular leads and neurostimulators were implanted to stimulate transposed gracilis or gluteus muscle. Success was defined as 70% reduction in solid stool incontinence for patients with baseline incontinence and zero incontinence to solid stool for patients with baseline stomas and for patients undergoing total anal reconstruction.
RESULTS: Overall, 85 of 128 graciloplasty patients (66%) achieved and maintained a successful outcome over the follow-up period. By etiology, these proportions were 71%, 50%, and 66% for patients with acquired fecal incontinence, congenital incontinence, and total anal reconstruction, respectively. One third of graciloplasty patients experienced a major wound complication, with therapy failing in 41%. Experienced centers had better outcomes and lower complication rates than inexperienced centers. Of the 11 gluteoplasty patients, 5 (45%) achieved and maintained a successful outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic graciloplasty may be an effective procedure for patients with refractory, end-stage fecal incontinence as well as for patients who require anorectal excision for low-lying malignancy. However, the procedure has significant morbidity that can lead to functional failure. Outcome after dynamic graciloplasty appears to correlate with surgical experience. In contrast to graciloplasty, the use of dynamic gluteoplasty should be limited to investigational purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10029613     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70176-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  29 in total

1.  Faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Michael A Kamm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-06

2.  Novel approach to treat fecal incontinence with muscle stem cell-based therapy.

Authors:  M Siemionow
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Investigation and treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  S Maslekar; A Gardiner; C Maklin; G S Duthie
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Fecal incontinence: an up-to-date critical overview of surgical treatment options.

Authors:  Christophe Müller; Orlin Belyaev; Thomas Deska; Ansgar Chromik; Dirk Weyhe; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Neurostimulated levator augmentation--a new approach in restoring continence.

Authors:  Christoph Isbert; Nicolas Schlegel; Joachim Reibetanz; Katica Krajinovic; Karsten Schmidt; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Mia Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Fecal incontinence: a review.

Authors:  Nicolas Bellicini; Peter J Molloy; Phillip Caushaj; Pamelasue Kozlowski
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Sacral neuromodulation for bowel dysfunction.

Authors:  J-L Faucheron; G Martin
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Office-based management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Vanessa C Costilla; Amy E Foxx-Orenstein; Anita P Mayer; Michael D Crowell
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-07

9.  Feasibility of neurovascular antropylorus perineal transposition with pudendal nerve anastomosis following anorectal excision: a cadaveric study for neoanal reconstruction.

Authors:  Abhijit Chandra; Ashok Kumar; M Noushif; Nitish Gupta; Vijay Kumar; Navneet Kumar Chauhan; Vishal Gupta
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2013-02-28

10.  Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  J D Puerta Díaz; R Castaño Llano; L J Lombana; J I Restrepo; G Gómez
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.