Literature DB >> 10028966

Auditory distance perception in rooms.

A W Bronkhorst1, T Houtgast.   

Abstract

The perceived distance of a sound source in a room has been shown to depend on the ratio of the energies of direct and reflected sound. Although this relationship was verified in later studies, the research has never led to a quantitative model. The advent of techniques for the generation of virtual sound sources has made it possible to study distance perception using controlled, deterministic stimuli. Here we present two experiments that make use of such stimuli and we show that a simple model, based on a modified direct-to-reverberant energy ratio, can accurately predict the results and also provide an explanation for the 'auditory horizon' in distance perception. The modification of the ratio consists of the use of an integration time of 6 milliseconds in the calculation of the energy of the direct sound. This time constant seems to be important in spatial hearing-the precedence effect is also based on a similar integration window.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10028966     DOI: 10.1038/17374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  32 in total

1.  Synchronizing to real events: subjective audiovisual alignment scales with perceived auditory depth and speed of sound.

Authors:  David Alais; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  On the minimum audible difference in direct-to-reverberant energy ratio.

Authors:  Erik Larsen; Nandini Iyer; Charissa R Lansing; Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Norbert Kopčo; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effect of stimulus spectrum on distance perception for nearby sources.

Authors:  Norbert Kopčo; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory distance coding in rabbit midbrain neurons and human perception: monaural amplitude modulation depth as a cue.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Pavel Zahorik; Laurel H Carney; Brian B Bishop; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Statistics of natural reverberation enable perceptual separation of sound and space.

Authors:  James Traer; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evidence for enhanced discrimination of virtual auditory distance among blind listeners using level and direct-to-reverberant cues.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Psychophysical evidence for auditory motion parallax.

Authors:  Daria Genzel; Michael Schutte; W Owen Brimijoin; Paul R MacNeilage; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Effect of dual sensory loss on auditory localization: implications for intervention.

Authors:  Helen J Simon; Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

10.  The detection of differences in the cues to distance by elderly hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd; Stuart Gatehouse; Julia Blaschke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.