Literature DB >> 10027371

Randomized comparison of prevertebral and retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction after resection of oesophageal carcinoma.

J J van Lanschot1, M van Blankenstein, H Y Oei, H W Tilanus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After potentially curative resection of oesophageal cancer and prevertebral gastric tube reconstruction, approximately one-quarter of patients develop secondary dysphagia due to locoregional recurrence. In half of them dysphagia can be prevented by using an extra-anatomical reconstruction route. The present randomized study was conducted to compare the technical and functional results after prevertebral and retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction.
METHODS: Sixty patients underwent resection of a carcinoma of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction with curative intent. Subsequently, these patients were randomly allocated to either prevertebral (n = 30) or retrosternal (n = 30) gastric tube reconstruction. Early and late complications and functional results were carefully monitored.
RESULTS: Creation of the retrosternal tunnel was not accompanied by any perioperative complications. Postoperative recovery, anastomotic leakage and benign stricture formation were not significantly different between the two groups. Functional results, as measured by scintigraphic gastric emptying, quantitative and qualitative oral food intake, and changes in body-weight were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: After subtotal oesophagectomy retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction can be performed easily and safely, and gives functional results similar to those obtained with prevertebral reconstruction. In patients at high risk for developing secondary malignant dysphagia the extra-anatomical route is the reconstruction of first choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10027371     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00981.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  21 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  W H Allum; S M Griffin; A Watson; D Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Esophagogastric anastomosis with invagination into stomach: New technique to reduce fistula formation.

Authors:  Alexandre Cruz Henriques; Carlos Alberto Godinho; Roberto Saad; Daniel Reis Waisberg; Aline Biral Zanon; Manlio Basilio Speranzini; Jaques Waisberg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Impact of the route of reconstruction on post-operative morbidity and malnutrition after esophagectomy: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Makoto Yamasaki; Hiroshi Miyata; Takushi Yasuda; Osamu Shiraishi; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Masaaki Motoori; Masahiko Yano; Hitoshi Shiozaki; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up: the effect of the route of reconstruction.

Authors:  Iraklis E Katsoulis; Ioannis Robotis; Grigorios Kouraklis; Panagiotis Yannopoulos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature.

Authors:  Robert C G Martin; Murray F Brennan; David P Jaques
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Esophagectomy without mortality: what can surgeons do?

Authors:  Simon Law
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Prognostic indicators of surgery for esophageal cancer: a 5 year experience.

Authors:  Nadim Khan; Adil Bangash; Muzaffaruddin Sadiq
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

8.  Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis.

Authors:  Bruno Walther; Jan Johansson; Folke Johnsson; Christer Staël Von Holstein; Thomas Zilling
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The use of self-expanding silicone stents in esophageal cancer care: optimal pre-, peri-, and postoperative care.

Authors:  Robert Martin; Ryan Duvall; Susan Ellis; Charles R Scoggins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  [Management of delayed complications after esophagectomy].

Authors:  A Beham; S Dango; B M Ghadimi
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.