Literature DB >> 10027023

Attitudes of Swedish physicians and nurses towards the use of life-sustaining treatment.

P Sjokvist1, L Berggren, D J Cook.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining treatment have become accepted clinical practice within the intensive care unit (ICU). One important factor influencing these decisions is the attitudes of physicians and nurses.
METHOD: Questionnaire survey of physicians and nurses in ICUs in 12 Swedish university-affiliated and/or tertiary referral hospitals.
RESULTS: The response rate was 850 of 1081 (79%) potentially eligible health care workers. Respondents first rated the importance of 16 factors considered in the decision to withdraw life support. The most important factors were the patient's likelihood of surviving the current episode, patient advance directives, patient age and likelihood of long-time survival. Respondents also chose between five levels of care, ranging from comfort measures to full intensive care, in two of 12 different scenarios. Respondent characteristics affecting the level of care chosen were the number of years of ICU experience and the particular ICU in which the respondent worked.
CONCLUSION: Advance directives are believed by Swedish intensive care personnel to be very important in the decision to withdraw life support, contrary to several descriptive studies suggesting modest patient and family influence on these decisions. Attitudes towards the intensity of care vary between different centers, raising the possibility that levels of care for similar patients may differ across the country.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10027023     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430208.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  5 in total

1.  Critical care nurses' attitude towards life-sustaining treatments in South East Iran.

Authors:  Farideh Razban; Sedigheh Iranmanesh; Hasan Eslami Aliabadi; Mansooreh Azzizadeh Forouzi
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2016

2.  Reasons, considerations, difficulties and documentation of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units: the ETHICUS Study.

Authors:  Charles L Sprung; Thomas Woodcock; Peter Sjokvist; Bara Ricou; Hans-Henrik Bulow; Anne Lippert; Paulo Maia; Simon Cohen; Mario Baras; Seppo Hovilehto; Didier Ledoux; Dermot Phelan; Elisabet Wennberg; Wolfgang Schobersberger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  The life-sustaining treatments among cancer patients at end of life and the caregiver's experience and perspectives.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Myung Kyung Lee; Yoon Jung Chang; Chang Hoon You; Samyong Kim; Jong Soo Choi; Ho-Yeong Lim; Chang Geol Lee; Youn Seon Choi; Young Seon Hong; Si-Young Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Hyun Sik Jeong
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Attitudes of health care workers towards waking a terminally ill patient in the intensive care unit for treatment decisions.

Authors:  Bernice S Elger; Jean-Claude Chevrolet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Peter Sjokvist.

Authors:  Charles L Sprung; François Lemaire
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 17.440

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.